Hugging Face Trending Papers

Which Hand Was Late? Diagnosis for Robot Failure Recovery in Bimanual Tool Use

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The paper investigates how vision–language models (VLMs) diagnose failures in bimanual tool‑use tasks, where failures can arise from tool slip, timing mismatches between hands, or combined causes. It evaluates which sensing channels enable a diagnoser to identify each failure type, finding that tool slip is detectable on the tool hand, timing delays are observable on both arms, and some combined failures remain indistinguishable from passive sensing. The study also shows that a repair policy that escalates when the cause is unclear can match the performance of a policy with full cause knowledge, and that a VLM’s internal state captures the late hand almost perfectly, though the answer depends on question wording.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Oct 28

Which Hand Was Late? Diagnosis for Robot Failure Recovery in Bimanual Tool Use

The paper investigates how different sensing channels help diagnose failures in a simulated bimanual tool‑use task. It finds that a tool’s slip is best detected by the tool hand, while the identity of the late hand can be inferred from both arms but not reliably from a single hand’s sensor. A repair policy that escalates when the cause is unclear can fix as many failures as one that knows the exact cause within two attempts.

By Baptiste Bonin, Caro Strickland, Audrey Durand
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Feedback That Backfires: Why Small Language Model Agents Repeat the Call They Just Watched Fail

The study investigates why small language model agents tend to repeat a tool call that just failed. By recording the failed call and its error message in the transcript, the authors measure a negative corrective gain—agents are more likely to repeat the failed action, with a drop of about 1.03 nats per token. The problem is traced to the harness design rather than the model’s understanding of errors, and the authors show that replacing the verbatim call with a runtime-generated description of the failure can reduce this backfiring effect by 76%.

By Esmail Gumaan