arXiv:2608. 13695v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model providers routinely cite multilingual safety benchmarks spanning a dozen or more languages as evidence that their models are safe for non-English-speaking users.
By Chialuka Prisca-Mary Onuoha, Bright Etornam Sunu, Rashidat Sikiru
arXiv:2606. 28843v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuning a large language model is a ubiquitous method for enhancing its capability on a specific downstream task.
By Will Hawkins, Kaivalya Rawal, Jonathan Rystr{\o}m, Stratis Tsirtsis, Zihao Fu, Greta Warren, Ryan Brown, Eoin Delaney, Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Chris Russell
arXiv:2608. 02616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present the first independent, systematic evaluation of OpenAI's Privacy Filter (OPF), a 1.
By Rohith Uppala
arXiv:2608. 02616v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present what is, to our knowledge, the first systematic evaluation of OpenAI's Privacy Filter (OPF), a 1.
By Rohith Uppala
arXiv:2607. 10112v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety alignment in large language models remains brittle across languages: prompts reliably refused in English can elicit harmful compliance in non-English and low-resource settings.
By Chigozirim Ifebi, Brent Kong, Ayushi Mehrotra
Safety benchmarks for large language models often assess the risk of a user query, although the outcome of question answering depends on whether the response violates a policy. This distinction is cri...