The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2605.09129v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Circuit study aims to explain how language models (LMs) implement a task by localizing and interpreting a circuit: a computational subgraph respons...
arXiv:2608. 12334v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the impressive multilingual capabilities of Large Language Models, the latent dynamics dictating language selection remain poorly understood.
arXiv:2607. 12279v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Writing a sentence of exactly twelve words; ending a DNA sequence at the right codon; formatting an ASCII table.
Writing a sentence of exactly twelve words; ending a DNA sequence at the right codon; formatting an ASCII table. These are all tasks that language models can do that requires tracking how many tokens remain before a target.
The paper introduces Declarative Attention (DA), a protocol that lets language models explicitly declare which parts of their context to focus on during generation. By partitioning decoding into full-context, region-specific, and recent-output-only modes, the inference engine can skip large portions of the KV cache, dramatically reducing attended tokens. Experiments on 15 long-context tasks with off-the-shelf models show significant savings (52.0% and 31.1% reductions) with only modest accuracy drops that diminish as model size increases.
The paper investigates whether linguistic and arithmetic tasks in large language models (LLMs) rely on shared neural circuits. Using mechanistic interpretability techniques on five LLMs, the authors find that circuit similarity aligns primarily with task domain rather than input/output vocabularies or syntactic structure. This suggests that LLMs may employ largely separate neural circuits for language and arithmetic, indicating a modular organization of abilities.