arXiv AI By Qingyu Wu, Yuan Wei, Renju Liu, Hua Cheng

When Temporal Perturbations Act Like Sensor Biases: Label-Free Auditing of Wearable Activity Recognizers

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces SpectrumAudit, a label‑sealed auditing method for wearable human‑activity recognition models that uses phase‑randomized full‑window stimuli to probe sensor biases. By replaying the DC component and a zero‑mean residual on held‑out subjects, the audit demonstrates significant accuracy drops across 27 victim models, with DC perturbations proving more harmful than AC in most cases. The study also shows that the audit can distinguish between persistent sensor offsets and zero‑mean variations under a fixed peak‑budget.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

When Adaptation Hurts: Split Sensitivity and Person-Level Negative Transfer in Federated Wearable Onboarding

The paper evaluates six onboarding strategies for federated wearable models on five datasets using a leakage‑controlled protocol that fixes source checkpoints and separates calibration from evaluation. Results show that while average accuracy is high, person‑level performance can drop significantly, with some methods causing negative transfer for certain users. The study highlights that mean accuracy alone is insufficient and provides an auditable benchmark and failure map for future development.

By Rahil Aftab, Vineet Kumar Rakesh, Soumya Mazumdar, Tapas Samanta
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Evaluating Deep Multivariate Imputation Models on Wearable Device Data

The paper introduces a new evaluation protocol for deep multivariate imputation models on wearable device data, addressing the issue of structured missingness where sensor features drop out together. Using a Garmin smartwatch dataset from an epilepsy patient, the authors generate realistic block-missing patterns from training data and show that matching the training protocol to this distribution reduces BRITS’ mean absolute error by 43%. They also extend BRITS with time‑of‑day encoding and compare it to linear interpolation and SAITS, finding that no single model dominates and that model rankings vary with evaluation design.

By Skye Goodman, Roussel Desmond Nzoyem, Leandro Junges, Peter Kissack, Yasser Qureshi, Amberly Brigden, Jeff Clark, Nawid Keshtmand
arXiv AI
Aug 20

When Clean Signals Are Not Enough: Detecting Structural Ambiguity for Safe Wearable Stress Classification

The paper introduces the Individual Conformal Coupling Monitor (ICCM), a lightweight pre‑inference tool that detects structural ambiguity—when physiological signals that appear plausible individually form a pattern poorly supported by a person’s non‑stress baseline—in wearable stress classifiers. On the WESAD dataset, a Random Forest achieves high mean accuracy but fails entirely for Subject 14 due to weakened cross‑signal coupling near stress onset. ICCM quantifies subject‑specific coupling divergence and can route data to classify, defer, or abstain, reducing false positives slightly and withholding some misclassified windows, though it does not fully correct the failure.

By Saba A. Farahani, Hung Cao, Amir M. Rahmani