arXiv Machine Learning By Leutrim Uka, Severino Pinto, Gundula Hoffmann, Marina M. -C. H\"ohne

When Multi-Sensor Fusion Fails to Generalize: Cattle Posture Classification Under Animal-Level and Temporal Distribution Shift

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 24986v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated cattle posture-classification systems frequently report near-perfect accuracy, yet their robustness under realistic deployment conditions remains largely unknown.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 10

Democratising Camera Trap AI: An Open-Source Model for Detecting UK Mammals

arXiv:2606. 10940v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Camera traps have become a cornerstone of biodiversity monitoring, but the artificial intelligence that turns vast quantities of images into usable ecological data is often locked behind commercial platforms or trained on fauna that does not match that of the British Isles.

By Paul Fergus, Philip Stephens, Russell A. Hill, Lee Oliver, Katie Appleby, Sarah Beatham, Naomi Davies Walsh, Stuart Nixon, Naomi Matthews, Chris Sutherland, Kelly Hitchcock
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 9

Democratising Camera Trap AI: An Open-Source Model for Detecting UK Mammals

Camera traps have become a cornerstone of biodiversity monitoring, but the artificial intelligence that turns vast quantities of images into usable ecological data is often locked behind commercial platforms or trained on fauna that does not match that of the British Isles. In an attempt to remove barriers and increase uptake, we release an open-source object detection model for 31 classes, 28 common UK mammal and bird species, plus utility classes for humans, calibration poles, and vehicles, drawn from a curated dataset of 48,165 labelled instances assembled from multiple sites over a decade of operational deployment through Conservation AI and its successor, Trap Tracker.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

BMCTrack-d: Pig re-identification and tracking via back marks in challenging camera settings

BMCTrack-d is a novel tracking-by-detection method that uses unique back marks on pigs to achieve robust re-identification and tracking in challenging side-view camera settings. The approach employs a neural network-based back mark classifier followed by temporal consistency checks and deduplication to improve identity reliability over time. On a demanding test set, BMCTrack-d outperforms strong baselines, achieving higher-order tracking accuracy gains of 9.11% and 1.03%.

By David Brunner, Maciej Oczak, Marie Bordes, Jean-Loup Rault, Stephan M. Winkler, Viktoria Dorfer
arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

DeepForestVisionV2: Ecology-Driven Taxonomy Expansion for Camera-Trap Monitoring in African Tropical Forests

arXiv:2606.20223v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Camera-trap monitoring in African tropical forests increasingly extends beyond closed-canopy interiors to riverbanks, clearings, and park edges. Am...

By Hugo Magaldi, Theau d'Audiffret, Etienne Francois Akomo-Okoue, Bala Amarasekaran, Naomi Anderson, Claire Auger, Noemie Cappelle, Daniel Cornelis, Raphael Cornette, Tobias Deschner, Gabriel Dubus, Davy Fonteyn, Rosa M. Garriga, Jennifer Hatlauf, Innocent Kasekendi, Raymond Katumba, Aram Kazandjian, Alfred Ngomanda, Stephan Ntie, Simone Pika, Xavier Rufray, Harold Rugonge, John Justice Tibesigwa, Peter van Lunteren, Hadrien Vanthomme, Joeri A. Zwerts, Sabrina Krief
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 3

BMCTrack-d: Pig re-identification and tracking via back marks in challenging camera settings

BMCTrack-d is a novel tracking‑by‑detection system that uses unique back marks on pigs to enable reliable re‑identification and tracking in challenging side‑view camera settings. The approach combines a neural network back‑mark classifier with two post‑processing stages—temporal prediction consistency checks and deduplication—to improve identity reliability over time. On a demanding test set, BMCTrack‑d outperforms strong baselines (BoT‑SORT‑ReID and TrackTrack‑ReID) by 9.11% and 1.03% in higher‑order tracking accuracy, demonstrating the effectiveness of back‑mark‑based re‑identification for individual‑level pig monitoring.