arXiv Machine Learning By Shaowen Wang, Yiqi Dong, Ruinian Chang, Tansheng Zhu, Yuebo Sun, Kaifeng Lyu, Jian Li

When Bias Pretends to Be Truth: How Spurious Correlations Undermine Hallucination Detection in LLMs

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper examines a specific type of hallucination in large language models caused by spurious correlations—unintended, statistically prominent associations in training data such as surnames linked to nationalities. These hallucinations are confidently produced, persist regardless of model scaling or refusal fine‑tuning, and evade existing detection methods like confidence filtering and inner‑state probing. The authors use controlled synthetic experiments and evaluations on both open‑source and proprietary LLMs, including GPT‑5, to demonstrate the failure of current detection techniques and provide a theoretical explanation for why statistical biases undermine confidence‑based approaches.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

Hallucinations in LLMs: A Lifecycle-Based Survey of Causes, Detection, Mitigation, and Prevention

The paper surveys hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) through a lifecycle lens, covering causes, detection, mitigation, and prevention. It categorizes hallucinations into data‑related, training‑related, and inference‑related stages, aligning each with specific interventions. The authors also review benchmark datasets and propose a standardized framework to diagnose and address hallucinations for safer, more reliable LLMs.

By Naveen Lamba, Sanju Tiwari, Manas Gaur
arXiv AI
Aug 5

Quantifying Hallucinations in Language Language Models on Medical Textbooks

arXiv:2603. 09986v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hallucinations, the tendency for large language models to provide responses with factually incorrect and unsupported claims, is a serious problem within natural language processing for which we do not yet have an effective solution to mitigate against.

By Brandon C. Colelough, Davis Bartels, Dina Demner-Fushman