arXiv AI
When AI Agrees Too Much: Manipulating Automated Code Review via Bias Injection
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 15
Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
arXiv:2603.18740v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated Code Review (ACR) systems integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in software development workflows, rang...
arXiv AI
Jun 30
Words Speak Louder Than Code: Investigating Cognitive Heuristics in LLM-Based Code Vulnerability Detection
arXiv:2606. 30587v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers and practitioners increasingly apply Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated vulnerability detection.
arXiv AI
Jun 18
Code-Augur: Agentic Vulnerability Detection via Specification Inference
arXiv:2606. 18619v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The advent of agentic vulnerability detection is already becoming a watershed moment for software security.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
Workspace Topology as an Attack Vector in Agentic Coding Assistants
arXiv:2608. 14876v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic coding assistants are finding widespread use, not just in new code development but in quickly ingesting and leveraging third-party code.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detection
arXiv:2601. 19138v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Secure code review is critical during pre-integration, where Atlassian developers rely on lightweight analysis tools, while deep security assessment is deferred to later stages, delaying feedback and increasing remediation costs.
arXiv AI
Jun 15
SEVRA-BENCH: Social Engineering of Vulnerabilities in Review Agents
arXiv:2606. 13757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) reviewers are increasingly used in pull-request (PR) workflows, where their approvals help decide which code is merged into a repository.