arXiv AI By Omar Farouk Zouak, Selma Mani, Larbi Said Chikh, Raid Abderrezak Ouahioune

What the Query Remembers: Query Abstraction Governs Lexical and Dense Retrieval of Classical Arabic Poetry

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The study investigates how the remembered content of a user’s query influences retrieval performance for Classical Arabic poetry. By benchmarking nine dense encoders and BM25 across two corpora, three indexing modes, and two evaluation protocols, it finds that BM25 excels on tip‑of‑the‑tongue queries but ranks eighth on abstract queries, while dense encoders outperform BM25 on the latter. The results show that adding remembered half‑verses boosts BM25 dramatically, and that the choice of retrieval protocol can significantly alter perceived system effectiveness.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

DEPT: Document Embedding Preservation Tuning for Unified Query Expansion and Retrieval

The paper introduces DEPT, a method that trains a single decoder-only large language model to both expand queries and encode documents for retrieval. By preserving document embeddings close to their initial cached values while allowing gradients to flow through the generator, DEPT stabilizes retrieval targets and enables efficient index reuse and online hard‑negative mining. Experiments on the BEIR benchmark with Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507 and LLaMA‑3.2‑3B‑Instruct show that DEPT outperforms training‑free, independently trained, and staged unified baselines, with ablations confirming the benefits of preservation, whitening, end‑to‑end expansion training, and online negatives.

By Jingyuan Wang, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie, Mingxin Li, Yanzhao Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

CoHyDE: Iterative Co-Training of LLM Rewriter & Dense Encoder for Tool Retrieval

CoHyDE is an iterative co‑training framework that jointly trains a dense encoder and an LLM rewriter for tool retrieval from large API catalogs. The encoder is fine‑tuned with InfoNCE on catalog‑style hypothetical descriptions generated by the rewriter, while the rewriter is preference‑aligned via DPO against the encoder’s retrieval scores. On a 10k‑tool subset of ToolBench, three rounds of CoHyDE outperform the best single‑component baseline by 2.5 pp NDCG@5 on standard queries and 6.3 pp on vague queries, with the largest gains on the hardest vague tier.

By Vaishali Senthil, Ashutosh Hathidara, Sebastian Schreiber
arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

Semantically Rich, Metrically Affect-Blind: A Geometric Blind Spot in Modern Text Embedders

The paper uncovers a systematic mismatch in modern text embeddings: while sentiment can be extracted with high accuracy from frozen encoders, the embeddings’ cosine similarity metric barely reflects polarity differences. Across eleven models from 2021–2026, a linear probe achieves up to 91.3% accuracy, yet cosine similarity margins are only 0.003–0.064, leading to poor retrieval performance (e.g., Qwen3-Embedding-4B’s 64.3 MAP). Introducing a lightweight supervised‑contrastive head (Sentiment‑Injected Sentence Embeddings) dramatically improves probe accuracy, retrieval MAP, and polarity margins, but at the cost of downstream semantic similarity. "whyItMatters":"The findings reveal that widely used retrieval and clustering systems may ignore valuable sentiment information encoded in embeddings, impacting their effectiveness."

By Mahdi Naser Moghadasi
arXiv AI
Sep 4

STAIR (STructure Aware Information Retriever): A novel dataset and LLM based retriever for document structure augmentation

The paper introduces STAIR, a retrieval system that uses a document’s Table of Contents to guide large language models in accessing global structure, thereby reducing hallucinations in Retrieval Augmented Generation. Experiments with a fine‑tuned Differentiable Search Index show that ToC‑based retrieval yields a low hallucination rate (<0.05%) and improves Recall@1 to 82.6% on the newly released SearchTome benchmark, outperforming baselines like BM25, DPR, and Mistral. The authors also release SearchTome, a diverse dataset of 18 books across six domains, to encourage further research in ToC‑based retrieval.

By Vineet Kumar, Meghanadh Pulivarthi, vishwajeet kumar, Jaydeep Sen, Riyaz Ahmad Bhat, Sachindra Joshi