Hugging Face Trending Papers
What Should an Agent Forget? Separating What Is Stored from What Is Used
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 11
What Should an Agent Forget? Separating What Is Stored from What Is Used
The paper introduces RD-Forget, a training‑free framework that separates what a persistent language agent stores from what it uses at answer time. It keeps a source archive of all observations while a query‑conditioned memory view filters evidence relevant to the current question, using a frozen language‑model curator to group facts into semantic slots and preserve multi‑hop relations. The approach employs rate‑distortion principles to stay within a memory budget and demonstrates improvements across conversational memory, knowledge updating, fact consolidation, long‑context reasoning, and personalization tasks.
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16
TEM: Temporal State Tracking Memory for Large Language Model Agents
The paper introduces Temporal State Tracking Memory (TEM), a training‑free framework that stores facts as versioned records linked to their sources and retrieves the relevant versions in source order, labeling historical records before passing them to the answer model. TEM incorporates event memory and original dialogue turns to fill gaps in structured facts. Evaluations on 420 questions from 600 sessions with 60 personas show high key‑entity hit rates (75.71–97.62%) and significant improvements when historical labels are added, while keeping evidence compact (94–118 tokens per answer).
arXiv AI
Oct 5
APDMem: Agent-Controlled Progressive Disclosure for Query-Adaptive Long-Term Memory
APDMem is a hierarchical long‑term memory system for personalized LLM assistants that uses progressive disclosure to retrieve conversation history. It organizes memory into four layers—thematic summaries, personalized key facts, turn‑level evidence notes, and raw messages—and a controller reads from the top layer, drilling down only when necessary. This approach balances cost and fidelity, allowing simple queries to finish early while deeper inspection is triggered for complex or exact‑evidence requests, and a note synthesizer structures retrieved evidence before answer generation. Experiments on LongMemEval show APDMem performs strongly while accessing only 8% of the total conversations.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration
The paper introduces AMA, a framework that uses multiple agents—Constructor, Retriever, Judge, and Refresher—to manage memory for large language model agents. AMA’s hierarchical memory design dynamically adjusts retrieval granularity to match task complexity, while the Judge and Refresher ensure relevance, consistency, and timely updates. Experiments on long-context benchmarks show AMA outperforms existing baselines and cuts token usage by about 80% compared to full-context approaches.
arXiv AI
Jul 28
MemChain: Learning Interpretable Memory Traces for Memory-Augmented LLM Agents
arXiv:2607. 24097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory-augmented LLM agents typically answer queries by retrieving relevant memories and feeding them directly to an answer model.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
EdgeMem: LLM-Free Agent Memory Construction and Retrieval via Evidence-Preserving Multi-Anchor Hypergraph
EdgeMem is a new agent-memory method that preserves original interaction turns and organizes them using complementary content, temporal, and episodic cues via a multi‑anchor hypergraph. It performs lightweight local processing, returning source evidence directly and reserving LLM use only for final answer generation. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongMemEval‑S demonstrate strong retrieval and memory‑grounded question answering, with EdgeMem achieving the highest strict‑judge score among seven systems on LoCoMo while requiring no generative‑LLM calls for construction and retrieval.