What's the Catch? Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Vision-Language Models
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The paper introduces TimeCatch, a benchmark that evaluates temporal consistency in vision‑language models (VLMs) by treating temporal grounding as an anomaly detection problem. Temporal anomalies are created by swapping consecutive frames, while frame‑level anomalies involve replacing a frame with Gaussian noise. Across synthetic and real‑world datasets, VLMs reliably detect and localize frame‑level anomalies but perform near chance on temporal anomaly detection, whereas humans excel at both tasks.
arXiv:2606. 00987v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown strong visual understanding and language-guided grounding abilities, yet their capacity for multi-temporal visual reasoning remains underexplored.
Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to interpret complex visual semantics, yet their capacity for chronological reasoning remains under-explored. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate how VLMs perceive and reason about chronological information within and across images.
arXiv:2606. 05702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to interpret complex visual semantics, yet their capacity for chronological reasoning remains under-explored.
arXiv:2605. 08974v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced video understanding, they remain highly prone to hallucinations in dynamic scenes.
arXiv:2608. 11260v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) aims to identify anomalous events and localize their temporal intervals.