arXiv:2608.21583v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Oral cancer is a leading cause of mortality in low-to-middle-income countries, where a shortage of specialists delays diagnosis. While point-of-care sc...
By Siddhant Bharadwaj, Aakash Shedsale, Tejashree Subramanya, Mohd. Azfar, Praveen Birur, Debnath Pal, Shankararama Sharma, Anupama Shetty, Rajesh Sundaresan
arXiv:2608. 13939v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for assessing thyroid nodules, and the ACR TI-RADS framework standardizes diagnosis through five ultrasound feature categories that are aggregated into five risk levels (TR1-TR5).
By Bingxin Yu, Xueli Wang, Jerry Zhou, Wenyan Wang, Li Wen, Lan Huang, Xin Feng, Fengfeng Zhou, Kewei Li
The study evaluates lesion‑guided region‑of‑interest (ROI) deep learning for ovarian ultrasound classification, comparing it to global image, lesion contour, and contour‑based radiomics approaches across two public datasets. Using four deep‑learning architectures, the lesion‑guided ROI strategy achieved the highest accuracy (93.10% on MMOTU and 97.56% on OUD) with an AUC of 0.99, while requiring less annotation effort than contour‑based methods.
By Mehran Ahmad, Ali Abbasian Ardakani, Afshin Mohammadi, Alisa Mohebbi, Gernot Kronreif, Sepideh Hatamikia
arXiv:2607. 02594v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep learning is widely applied in medical image analysis, but up to 10% of manually labelled images may be incorrect, degrading model performance.
By Zhipeng Zhang, Wenhui Shou, Wengting Ma, Dongjia Xing, Qingqing Xu, Li-Qun Xu, Qingxia Fan, Ling Xu
arXiv:2607. 03466v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study aims to predict Tumor, Node, and Metastasis (TNM) stage labels independently, with the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) pathology report as the sixth shared task of SMM4H-HeaRD 2026.
By Joseph Itopa Abubakar, Jorge Jarme, Favour Igwezeke, Mary Adewunmi
This study presents a clinically relevant framework for evaluating deep neural networks that segment lymphoma lesions in PET/CT images, addressing gaps such as out‑of‑distribution testing and comparison with expert annotators. Using 611 multi‑institutional cases, the authors assess four networks (ResUNet, SegResNet, DynUNet, SwinUNETR) with lesion‑specific metrics, detection criteria, and metabolic‑characteristic‑based thresholds, finding that models perform best on large, intense lesions. The work also demonstrates that network errors mirror those of physicians, highlighting shared challenges with small, faint lesions.
By Shadab Ahamed, Yixi Xu, Sara Kurkowska, Claire Gowdy, Joo H. O, Ingrid Bloise, Don Wilson, Patrick Martineau, Fran\c{c}ois B\'enard, Fereshteh Yousefirizi, Rahul Dodhia, Juan M. Lavista, William B. Weeks, Carlos F. Uribe, Arman Rahmim