arXiv Computation and Language By Tawan Thaepprasit, Peeranuth Kehasukcharoen, Ding Wang, Remi Denton, Peerapon Vateekul, Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn

What Limits Us? Analyzing Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper examines the mandatory Limitations sections that have appeared in many top-tier NLP conferences since late 2022. By applying a novel human‑AI hybrid qualitative coding framework, the authors analyze Limitations sections from ACL and EMNLP papers published between 2020 and 2025 to uncover trends over time, correlations with paper attributes, and recurring writing patterns. The study provides a critical reflection on the diverse challenges researchers report and on their self‑reporting practices within the NLP community.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Sep 12

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) can perform multi-coder qualitative coding by independently coding, debating, and reconciling disagreements. It quantifies the effectiveness of this approach across diverse datasets, identifying key factors—such as codebook length, data similarity, and agent disagreement—that influence coding accuracy. The study finds that intense, unresolved debates improve accuracy but that LLMs still lack adaptive responsiveness to context, leading to design recommendations for automated coding systems.

By Jeongyeon Kim, John Mitchell
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

arXiv:2606. 02255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human annotation is the empirical foundation of much NLP research, from dataset construction to model evaluation, but papers often leave unclear who produced the annotations and how the annotation process was controlled.

By Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli, Yanran Chen, Christian Greisinger, Lotta Kiefer, Christoph Leiter, Subhadeep Roy, Tewodros Achamaleh, Muhammad Arslan Manzoor, Sebastian Pohl, Yufang Hou, Steffen Eger