arXiv Machine Learning
Wait, Wait, Wait... Why Do Reasoning Models Loop?
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23
Ladders of Thought: A Self-Evolving Curriculum of Progressively Simplified Reasoning Traces
Ladders-of-Thought (LoT) is a framework that enhances reasoning in small- to mid-scale large language models by automatically generating easier variants of reasoning problems and organizing them into difficulty buckets. It uses a self‑evolving bandit scheduler to adaptively allocate training, improving performance across math and multi‑hop reasoning tasks on 1–8 B models. LoT achieves significant gains (e.g., +32 pp on AddSub, +16 pp on QASC) and converges faster than staged curricula.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Cornerstones or Stumbling Blocks? Deciphering the Rock Tokens in On-Policy Distillation
arXiv:2605. 09253v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While recent work in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has shown that a small subset of critical tokens disproportionately drives reasoning gains, an analogous token-level understanding of On-Policy Distillation (OPD) remains largely unexplored.
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 15
Learning to Compute Is Not Learning to Retain or Reuse in Looped Transformers
arXiv:2610.19768v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped transformers compute by applying one block repeatedly, so they can run for more loops than they were trained with. Recurrent reasoners are known...
arXiv AI
Oct 2
Masked Self-Distillation: Internalizing the Chain-of-Thought in Language Models
The paper introduces masked self‑distillation, a post‑training framework that trains a language model to internalize portions of its own intermediate reasoning traces. By varying the fraction of trace internalized, the authors demonstrate that models can achieve higher inference efficiency and improved task performance on math and graph‑coloring problems. Experiments on Qwen3‑4B and Qwen3‑8B show that the method generalizes well to in‑domain out‑of‑distribution cases without catastrophic forgetting, and that supervised fine‑tuning alone can reduce trace length at the expense of generalization.
arXiv AI
Jul 21
Can We Break LLMs Out of Self-Loops? Fine-Grained Reasoning Control with Activation Steering
arXiv:2607. 18100v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Extended reasoning has become standard for frontier Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the trajectories these models produce remain largely uncontrollable.
arXiv AI
Aug 11
Understanding and Mitigating Premature Confidence for Better LLM Reasoning
arXiv:2605. 24396v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long chains of thought (CoT) from current language models frequently contain logical gaps and unjustified leaps, limiting the gains from additional test-time compute.