arXiv:2609.24362v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Sandboxed computer environments support multi-step reasoning with tools, executable programs, and persistent files, yet their extension from language m...
By Hexiong Yang, Mingrui Chen, Jie Cao, Ran He
arXiv:2606. 07595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language agents increasingly consume screenshots, documents, and user interfaces before writing to memory, sending messages, or invoking external tools.
By Youting Wang, Yuan Tang, Yitian Qian, Chen Zhao
arXiv:2610.29241v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate why vision-language models (VLMs) produce errors by decomposing them into two sources: visual-representation failures, in...
By Anat Veikherman, Mor Ventura, Nitay Calderon, Lihi Zelnik-Manor, Roi Reichart
arXiv:2609.26168v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Recent work reports that vision--language models (VLMs) struggle to establish and maintain stable reference in repeated reference games. Rather than...
By Joseph Bingham
arXiv:2609.22910v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language agents that crop and zoom are trained with rewards that credit a successful tool call, yet a successful call does not show that the mod...
By Kunyu Peng, Junming Liu, Ruiqi He, Qingzhuo Wang, Jianzhong Qi, Xianhui Liu
The paper investigates how providing execution traces to multimodal judges in agentic video‑generation systems can bias their verdicts. On a benchmark of 109 two‑event clips, traces that falsely report successful tool calls cause large‑language‑model judges to incorrectly accept 78–90 % of failures, while contradictory traces lead to 100 % rejection of correct clips. The effect persists even when judges are instructed to consider only the video frames, indicating that the vulnerability stems from the judges’ learned trust in tool logs rather than the visual content itself.
By Jian Xu