arXiv:2605. 08253v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Distributional reinforcement learning (DRL) models the full return distribution, but existing finite-support or quantile-based methods rely on projections, while recent flow-based approaches can suffer from \emph{boundary mismatch} at the flow source or from \emph{high-variance} bootstrapping when current and successor noises are independent.
By Boyang Xu, Qing Zou, Siqin Yang, Hao Yan
arXiv:2606. 17551v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Iterative generative modeling techniques, such as flow matching, provide powerful tools to model complex behaviors for effective offline reinforcement learning (RL).
By Aditya Oberai, Seohong Park, Sergey Levine
arXiv:2609.15123v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Flow-based policies offer an expressive representation for online reinforcement learning, but conventional flow matching requires samples drawn from...
By Bumgeun Park, Hyukjun Yang, Donghwan Lee
arXiv:2603. 09344v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables data-efficient and safe policy learning without online exploration, but its performance often degrades under distribution shift.
By Hongqiang Lin, Zhenghui Fu, Weihao Tang, Pengfei Wang, Yiding Sun, Qixian Huang, Dongxu Zhang
arXiv:2507. 20068v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Off-policy evaluation (OPE) methods estimate the value of a new reinforcement learning (RL) policy prior to deployment.
By Aishwarya Mandyam, Jason Meng, Ge Gao, Jiankai Sun, Mac Schwager, Barbara E. Engelhardt, Emma Brunskill
arXiv:2607. 26509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep off-policy reinforcement learning algorithms for continuous control typically rely on neural value function approximation to guide policy improvement.
By Gong Gao, Xiao Lai, Ziqi Xie, Guojie Chen, Xianhui Liu, Weidong Zhao