arXiv:2510. 07650v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While most reinforcement learning methods today flatten the distribution of future returns to a single scalar value, distributional RL methods exploit the return distribution to provide stronger learning signals and to enable applications in exploration and safe RL.
By Perry Dong, Chongyi Zheng, Chelsea Finn, Dorsa Sadigh, Benjamin Eysenbach
arXiv:2606. 08602v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present an online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for fine-tuning flow-matching policies in continuous-control problems.
By Boshu Lei, Kostas Daniilidis, Antonio Loquercio
arXiv:2610.01413v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms frequently compare probability distributions, such as state visitation distributions induced by policies and e...
By Yujie Zhu, Charles A. Hepburn, Matthew Thorpe, Giovanni Montana
arXiv:2609.15123v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Flow-based policies offer an expressive representation for online reinforcement learning, but conventional flow matching requires samples drawn from...
By Bumgeun Park, Hyukjun Yang, Donghwan Lee
arXiv:2603. 09344v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables data-efficient and safe policy learning without online exploration, but its performance often degrades under distribution shift.
By Hongqiang Lin, Zhenghui Fu, Weihao Tang, Pengfei Wang, Yiding Sun, Qixian Huang, Dongxu Zhang
The paper introduces Deep-BQRL, a model‑free distributional reinforcement‑learning framework that extends buffered‑quantile learning to neural function approximation. It learns conditional return quantiles from sampled transitions, constructs buffered action scores, and uses ensemble disagreement for exploration, enabling risk‑sensitive decision‑making without explicit return‑law planning. Experiments on asset‑selling and slippery FrozenLake show that Deep‑BQRL achieves smaller mean cumulative point‑quantile policy gaps than PPO and TRPO, while illustrating interpretable risk‑sensitive stopping decisions.
By Mohammad Alipour-vaezi, Sajad Khodadadian