arXiv Computation and Language By Kanay Gupta, David Y. Liu, Aditya Joshi

Unreliable Narrator Framing as a Cost-effective Mechanism for Satire Explanation of Australian and American Satirical News

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper presents a pilot study on generating explanations for satirical news from Australia and the United States, highlighting the difficulty of incorporating recent and local context. It proposes using framing explanations based on unreliable narrator theory with open‑weight models as a cost‑effective alternative to frontier models, and finds that these models more accurately identify satirical tropes in American articles than in Australian ones. The study also introduces a new dataset and evaluation benchmark for satirical explanation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Detecting Satirical Code-Mixed Sentences

The paper introduces CS‑SeLeRoSa, a synthetic dataset of over 600k code‑mixed Romanian sentences with English, German, French, and Italian, generated via four methods (random replacement, phrase translation, dependency parsing, and large language models). It evaluates multilingual large language models on satire detection in this dataset and a human‑annotated gold benchmark, CS‑SeLeRoSa‑Gold, showing that newer models like Gemma 4 31B outperform older open models and achieve competitive zero‑shot performance, with fine‑tuning further improving results.

By R\u{a}zvan-Alexandru Sm\u{a}du, Ioana Buhnila, Daniela Tanase, Dumitru-Clementin Cercel, Florin Pop, Mihaela-Claudia Cercel
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 29

Fake News Theories: Harnessing Disciplinary Insights for Computational Modeling, Detection, and Explanation

The paper presents a theory-informed computational framework that converts cross-disciplinary theories of fake news into measurable features for automated detection and explanation. By reviewing theories from social sciences, psychology, economics, and more, the authors establish a broad theoretical foundation for computational modeling. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that theory-derived features are predictive, provide interpretable diagnostic signals, and that multi-feature models generally outperform individual features, though gains are modest.

By Zhaoyang Cao, Miriam Metzger, Reza Zafarani
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 28

Where Does Rhetorical Distortion Live? A Multi-Platform, Multi-Language Measurement of Influencer Content

The study introduces a unified method for measuring rhetorical distortion across six social media platforms and two languages, distinguishing between creator posts and their replies. It identifies five distortion dimensions—Significance Inflation, Anxiety Manufacturing, Novelty Claims, Loaded Language, and Temporal Distortion—using a three‑tier pipeline that combines lexical rules, negative filters, and LLM verification. Results show that distortion is far more strongly linked to the platform than content type, with X/Twitter exhibiting the highest distortion scores, and that the audience layer (replies) carries significantly more distortion than creator posts.

By Xucheng Yu, Jiangping Chen, Haohan Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 18

Propaganda Forensics: Recovering the Generation Pipeline of an AI-Driven Influence Campaign

arXiv:2608. 15746v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a forensic analysis of the generation pipeline behind a recent AI-driven influence campaign.

By Benjamin Icard, Elouan Vuichard, Louis Lefebvre, Lila Sainero, Thomas Girault, Alice Breton, Tanguy Launay, Gauvain Bourgne, Morgane Casanova, Guillaume Gadek, Victor Kl\"otzer, Michel Le Nouy, Guillaume Gravier, Jean-Gabriel Ganascia, Paul \'Egr\'e