arXiv AI By Subham Ghosh, Shubham Tiwari, Mohammad Ibrahim, Abhishek Tewari

Unlocking the Visual Record of Materials Science: A Large-Scale Multimodal Dataset from Scientific Literature

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 29667v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The materials science literature encodes decades of experimental knowledge in figures, yet this visual record remains locked away and inaccessible to AI at scale.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
2d ago

A Pathway to General-Purpose Scientific AI: Multimodal Comprehension of Scientific Images

arXiv:2608. 14075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific figures and tables encode essential experimental evidence, yet remain difficult for digital libraries and multimodal AI systems to retrieve and interpret.

By Jennifer D'Souza, Fahad Ahmed, Cecilia Andrea Bustamante Andrade, Lina Frolova, Poorani Gnanasambandan, Dilshad Hussain, Muhammad Uzair Khan, Nkembeng Kevin Nkengfoa, Paul Praveen J., Fabio Priante, Sjoerd Franciscus van der Werf, Thomas Frederik Jan van Roeden
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Beyond Text and Tables: Vision-Language Model Integration in ComProScanner for Extracting Materials Data from Scientific Figures with High Accuracy

arXiv:2606. 00065v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated extraction of materials composition-property data from scientific literature has advanced considerably with the development of large language model-based pipelines; however, existing frameworks remain limited to textual and tabular content, overlooking the substantial proportion of quantitative property data reported exclusively in scientific figures.

By Aritra Roy, Enrico Grisan, Chiara Gattinoni, John Buckeridge
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

SciFigQual-Bench: A Benchmark for Scientific Figure Quality Assessment with Full-Manuscript Context

Scientific images are the core elements of presenting experimental conclusions, elaborating system architecture, and supporting comparative arguments in scientific papers. However, existing image quality assessment (IQA) methods are predominantly designed for natural photographs or AI-generated content, which cannot be directly applied to scientific papers.