Hugging Face Trending Papers

Understanding the limits of latent world models

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The paper investigates whether latent world models truly capture the underlying dynamics of their environments. It introduces the idea of faithful latent world models, defined as an equivariance between the environment’s transition map and the learned latent dynamics, and proposes latent rollout consistency (LRC) as a metric for evaluating action‑conditioned latent predictions. Experiments show that none of the state‑of‑the‑art latent world models studied actually faithfully model the environment’s dynamics, despite solving the tasks they were trained on.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Oct 28

Understanding the limits of latent world models

The paper introduces the notion of faithful latent world models, defined as an equivariance between an environment’s transition map and the learned latent dynamics. It proposes latent rollout consistency (LRC) as a metric for evaluating action‑conditioned latent predictions. Experiments show that current state‑of‑the‑art latent world models fail to faithfully model the environment’s dynamics, despite achieving task performance.

By Rodrigo Gonzalez Laiz, Steffen Schneider
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Predicting Consequences and Reinforcing Navigation Policies with Latent World Models

The paper introduces a Latent World Model (LWM) for robot navigation that predicts action‑conditioned latent feature compatibility instead of reconstructing future observations. By exploiting the correlation between spatial proximity and latent feature similarity, the model evaluates action consequences directly in latent space and supports counterfactual training using sampled action sequences. The learned world model can supervise policy learning from unlabeled video and further improve policies via reinforcement learning entirely within the model, eliminating the need for action annotations and additional environment interaction.

By Zengmao Wang, Wei Gao, Shuhan Shen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 29

world2vec: Mechanistic world models through latent dynamics learning

The paper introduces world2vec, a method for learning mechanistic world models that capture true system dynamics without relying on reward signals. By learning latent dynamics from observations and actions, world2vec achieves accurate long‑horizon predictions with significantly fewer parameters than existing models such as DreamerV3, TD-MPC2, and LeWM. This efficiency enables state‑of‑the‑art control of continuous environments from pixel inputs and precise system identification across 71 benchmark attractors, illustrating the potential of world models for scientific discovery.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 15

OneLA: Learning Many Worlds from Latent Actions

arXiv:2610.20160v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning world models across diverse domains calls for a unified control space, yet ac- tion interfaces vary across domains and action annotations are...

By Ziyu Zhu, Zhaoxu Sun, Fan Jiang, Chiyu Wang, Junfeng Ni, Mu Xu
arXiv AI
Oct 16

T2-z: Test-Time Optimization of Environment Latents for Robotic World Models

T2-Z introduces a test‑time optimization framework that augments robotic world models with a learnable environment latent, enabling the model to adapt to unseen environmental conditions without explicit supervision of those factors. During training, the method alternates between optimizing the world‑model dynamics and the latent representation, allowing the latent to capture underlying environmental variation. At test time, a freshly initialized latent is optimized from a few interactions, reducing prediction error from 15.20 to 7.00 and increasing action success from 33.73% to 72.96% across simulated and real‑world tasks.

By Chenyuan Zhou, Yining Hong, Huang Huang, Yunfan Jiang, Wenlong Huang, David Held, Vitor Campagnolo Guizilini, Yue Wang, Li Fei-Fei, Jiajun Wu, Leonidas Guibas, Yejin Choi