arXiv:2303. 15619v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The choice of \emph{which} tokens to mask is a central, under-examined design decision in masked language modeling (MLM).
By Muhammed Shahir Abdurrahman, Hashem Elezabi, Bruce Changlong Xu
arXiv:2610. 01578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Why can masked prediction learn useful representations that unmasked reconstruction misses?
By Jorge Medina Moreira, Lorenzo Bardone, Lenka Zdeborov\'a
arXiv:2607. 21353v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific training data while preserving model utility.
By Billel Habbati, Alessio Merlo, Luca Verderame, Meriem Guerar
arXiv:2609.39704v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: This paper demonstrate that whether masking-based token pruning helps or hurts worst-group robustness can be predicted before deployment, without lab...
By Muhammad Zawish, Steven Davy
This paper demonstrate that whether masking-based token pruning helps or hurts worst-group robustness can be predicted before deployment, without labels or fine-tuning. A systematic study of semantic...
Informed Masking (IM) is a new technique for aligning Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) with Reinforcement Learning (RL). It identifies a systematic upstream/downstream token structure in dLLM rollouts and shows that masking downstream tokens creates better subproblems for likelihood estimation. When integrated into three state‑of‑the‑art dLLM RL methods on LLaDA‑8B‑Instruct, IM yields up to 2.01%, 8.68%, and 5.77% relative average gains on math and planning benchmarks while improving training stability.
By Xiaoyi Yu, Enver Sangineto, Pei Fu, Fiorenzo Parascandolo, Wenhui Tan, Ruikang Zhang, Rita Cucchiara, Ruihua Song, Jian Luan