arXiv Computation and Language By Chaewan Chun, Meruyert Aristombayeva, Jiyoung Choi, Mahjabin Nahar, Delvin Ce Zhang, Dongwon Lee

TRILOGUE: A Trilingual Spoken Dialogue Fact-Checking Benchmark with Evidence and Paired Audio

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

TRILOGUE is a new trilingual benchmark for spoken dialogue fact‑checking, covering English, Russian, and Kazakh. It includes almost 12,000 dialogues, 187,000 turns, and 390 hours of paired audio with ASR transcripts and word‑level timestamps, as well as nearly 5,000 human‑recorded Russian and Kazakh files. The dataset supports tasks such as claim check‑worthiness detection, evidence retrieval, and claim verification under various input conditions, and baseline experiments reveal challenges with ASR errors and cross‑lingual transfer, especially for Kazakh.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

Lost in Speech: Trilingual Spoken Hallucination Detection Across Audio and Transcripts

The paper introduces a trilingual spoken hallucination detection benchmark covering English, Russian, and Kazakh news, with 12,013 samples that include synthetic alterations and severity levels, as well as 290 fact‑checked misinformation items. Detectors are evaluated in a reference‑free setting on text, ASR transcripts, and audio, revealing that most models underperform baseline classifiers, except Gemma‑3n on transcripts. Synthetic‑trained detectors achieve high macro‑F1 scores on real‑world misinformation, but Russian provenance analysis highlights model‑dependent signals that confound synthetic benchmarks.

By Meruyert Aristombayeva, Jason S. Lucas, Chaewan Chun, Dongwon Lee
arXiv AI
Sep 25

To Trust or Not to Trust: Retrieval-Augmented Fact Checking in Speech

The paper introduces VeriSpeak, a benchmark of 3,879 spoken claims for evaluating fact verification in Large Audio Language Models (LALMs). It shows a clear modality gap: models that verify written claims well often fail on spoken versions, and retrieval alone offers limited improvement. Combining retrieval with explicit reasoning yields the best performance, reaching 86.1% accuracy and demonstrating the need for grounded reasoning over retrieved evidence in speech misinformation detection.

By Debajyoti Mazumder, Mamta, Abhirama Subramanyam Penamakuri
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

Context-Aware Multimodal Claim Verification in Spoken Dialogues

The paper introduces MAD2, a synthetic benchmark of 1,000 two‑speaker dialogues with about 10 hours of audio and 1,230 check‑worthy sentence annotations for spoken claim verification. It proposes a calibrated multimodal fusion approach that combines a context‑aware audio encoder with a dialogue‑aware text model. Experiments show that adding dialogue context improves verification performance, though the gains differ across scenarios, and that fusion offers the largest advantage when full‑dialogue context is available, though it does not consistently outperform text alone.

By Chaewan Chun, Delvin Ce Zhang, Dongwon Lee
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

M3-DuplexBench: A Multi-Turn, Multilingual, Multidomain Benchmark for Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models

M3-DuplexBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate full‑duplex spoken dialogue systems (FDSDSs) that can listen while speaking. It covers multi‑turn interactions in both English and Japanese across casual conversation and question‑answering domains, jointly assessing interaction timing and response content. The benchmark also offers a reference‑conditioned setting to test sensitivity to dialogue history and trajectory mismatch.

By Ryo Fukuda, Atsushi Ando, Hiroki Kanagawa, Takatomo Kano, Marc Delcroix, Naohiro Tawara, Yuya Chiba