Neyshekar: An Open Persian Read-Speech Corpus for Automatic Speech Recognition
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2510.10774v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Persian remains substantially underrepresented in open speech-text resources, limiting progress in multi-speaker text-to-speech (TTS), speech...
ufakzeka-kulak is an open Turkish speech‑to‑text model with 31.6 M parameters, built using a FastConformer encoder, a token‑and‑duration transducer (TDT), and a CTC head. It was trained from scratch on 4,977 hours of data—281 hours of human transcription and 4,696 hours of machine‑generated subtitles that were verified by a second reading—under licenses permitting commercial use. The model outputs cased, punctuated Turkish text with numbers written as words, achieving a normalised WER of 0.0921 on FLEURS Turkish and 0.0916 on Common Voice 27.0 Turkish, outperforming Whisper base and small models, and it is released under Apache‑2.0.
arXiv:2608. 12327v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual pretrained models nominally support Nepali, yet no controlled benchmark has compared them under a single fine-tuning protocol.
arXiv:2607. 17164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Developing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for morphologically rich, low-resource languages such as Assamese is challenging due to insufficient annotated speech data.
arXiv:2606. 03504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present BaltiVoice, a 16.
The paper introduces a synthetic Bengali speech dataset tailored for telecom customer‑care applications, comprising 10,000 audio‑text pairs (≈26.82 hours) with predefined train, validation, and test splits. The data were generated using OmniVoice voice‑cloning, and include both original and normalized transcripts for ASR/STT use. Automatic intelligibility evaluation with a fine‑tuned Whisper model shows an average WER of 2.54% and CER of 0.59%, indicating strong text‑audio consistency, while the authors note limitations of synthetic speech and STT‑based evaluation.