arXiv:2508. 18173v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The discovery of symbolic governing equations is a central goal in science; yet, it remains challenging particularly for graph dynamical systems, where the network topology further shapes the system behavior.
By Riccardo Cappi, Paolo Frazzetto, Nicol\`o Navarin, Alessandro Sperduti
The paper introduces Fundamental Dynamical Units (FDUs), signed three‑node interaction patterns that reduce the combinatorial complexity of interaction architectures in networked dynamical systems. By embedding FDU‑regularized structural inference into a physics‑informed neural ODE, the authors jointly recover interaction structure and perturbation‑resolved trajectories, demonstrating the approach on synthetic benchmarks. This framework enables motif‑prescribed intervention design and mechanistically interpretable inference in complex systems.
By Nima Nouri
arXiv:2608. 08689v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The state evolution of a complex system arises jointly from object laws, relational propagation, domain conservation, and unmodeled error.
By Wei Wang, Yaosen Chen, Han Yang, Yuegen Liu, Mingli Luo, Xinxin Jiao, Xuming Wen, Ming Liu
arXiv:2606. 30789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a standard tool for improving the reasoning ability of large language models, yet its training dynamics are still described empirically: reward trajectories are fit with low-parameter functional forms whose constants carry no mechanistic meaning, and hyperparameter choices remain a matter of trial and error.
By Rajat Ghosh, Datta Nimmaturi, Aryan Singhal, Vaishnavi Bhargava, Henry Wong, Johnu George, Debojyoti Dutta
arXiv:2606. 04476v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we study the gradient descent dynamics for jointly training both layers of a one-hidden-layer ReLU network to fit a linear target function.
By Berk Tinaz, Changzhi Xie, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi
The paper presents a variational learning framework that simultaneously infers non‑parametric interaction kernels and environmental or intra‑agent forces in collective dynamics. It extends existing methods to handle both interaction and environmental components, validating the approach on benchmark models such as synchronization, alignment, and attraction‑repulsion systems. A model‑selection procedure is also introduced to identify the best explanatory framework from trajectory data, enabling direct recovery of mechanistic interaction mechanisms.
By Nipuni de Silva, Ming Zhong, James M. Greene