arXiv:2606. 00611v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon LLM agents produce safety evidence across long trajectories, where sparse, delayed, and compositional risk signals often escape local moderation.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2605.27690v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM agents increasingly operate through multi-turn tool use and environment interaction, where safety risks often emerge from intermediate st...
arXiv:2608.15242v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In long agent executions, an early error can persist through later actions and checks, while evidence needed to trace its origin is dispersed acros...
arXiv:2606. 07054v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous LLM agents can pursue hidden malicious objectives through sequences of individually benign actions, making sabotage difficult to detect using standard trajectory-level monitoring.
arXiv:2604. 02022v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating the safety of LLM-based agents is increasingly important because risks in realistic deployments often emerge over multi-step interactions rather than isolated prompts or final responses.
arXiv:2608. 06346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agentic systems have shown remarkable capabilities in complex domains, while suffering from cascading errors and difficulty in debugging.
arXiv:2608. 15242v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a long-horizon agent execution fails, outcome-level evaluation reveals the unsuccessful result but not where the decisive error entered the trajectory.