arXiv AI
TPvG: A Moral Decision Framework for Large Language Models from One-Shot to Sequential Feedback
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 10
On the Context Sensitivity of LLM Moral Judgment
arXiv:2603.23114v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A human's moral decision depends heavily on the context. Yet research on LLM morality has largely studied fixed scenarios. We address this gap by i...
arXiv AI
Aug 14
Agreement Is Not Alignment: Divergent Moral Grounds in Human and LLM Ethical Judgments
arXiv:2608. 12368v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agreement with human judgments is a common proxy for evaluating the alignment of large language models (LLMs).
arXiv AI
Sep 7
Moral Competence Before Moral Content: Why LLM Agents Lack the Prerequisites for Coherent Alignment
The paper argues that AI alignment depends on a system’s ability to exhibit a coherent moral policy—stable, monotonic, decisive, and Pareto‑viable—rather than on any specific moral standard. The authors test nine large language models across varied moral scenarios and find that none maintain consistent verdicts, with surface‑form changes causing up to 99% shifts in outcomes. This indicates that current LLM agents lack the structural moral competence required for meaningful alignment.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 20
A Geometric Perspective on Stabilizing Value Conflict Resolution
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to navigate value conflicts when trained with the compressed scalar rewards of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). To address this challenge, we investigate how chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning can help improve performance in this domain.
arXiv AI
Aug 11
CORDA: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Harm-Centric Moral Reasoning in Large Language Models
arXiv:2608. 08061v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The key question in moral judgement is not simply whether someone chooses the "right" answer, but how they decide what matters most when moral principles conflict.
arXiv AI
Aug 24
Explaining Intrinsic Moral Self-Correction with Mechanistic Interpretability
arXiv:2505.11924v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Intrinsic moral self-correction refers to the phenomenon where a language model refines its ethical judgments or aligns its outputs purely th...