arXiv:2604. 17502v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Misaligned artificial agents might resist shutdown.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
The paper introduces Delta, a two‑phase framework for testing deep reinforcement learning agents. In the first phase, the agent under test is evaluated for catastrophic failures while collecting decision‑making data. The second phase trains a challenger agent from this data using offline RL; comparing the challenger’s rewards to the original agent reveals optimality bugs, and Delta successfully uncovered thousands of such issues across multiple environments.
AgentRM proposes a generalizable reward model to guide LLM-based agents during test-time search, outperforming direct policy fine-tuning. Three reward modeling strategies—explicit, implicit, and LLM-as-a-judge—are explored, and AgentRM improves base policy performance by an average of 8.8 points across nine tasks, surpassing top general agents by 4.0 points. It also shows strong weak-to-strong generalization and can boost specialized agents, with plans to release code for further research.
RISED introduces a framework that uses rubric-based textual feedback to improve training of a single large language model (LLM) agent across multiple interactive environments. By having an LLM judge tag rollouts with a shared rubric vocabulary, the system guides both online data selection and policy supervision, enabling richer cross‑environment relationships and within‑group reward contrast. Experiments show that RISED achieves the highest mean pass rate and ranks first or second in every individual environment, with rubric analysis revealing behavioural changes behind these gains.
Large language model (LLM) agents now fix software, operate computers and serve customers, but their harnesses, the programs that run them, call a large LLM at every step, which makes long tasks slow...
JevAgentHarness is a new framework that benchmarks, deploys, and trains decision models to share control with large language models (LLMs) in agentic tasks. It introduces AgentDecisionBench to evaluate decision models from isolated questions to full agent control, revealing that accurate isolated decisions still miss many tasks and that naïve delegation can reduce success. By fitting confidence thresholds per choice and training a 4B decision model on states after agent mistakes, JevAgentHarness achieves high task success while cutting cost and speeding up execution, with results and resources made publicly available.
The paper introduces the Agentic Compositional Generalization hypothesis, suggesting that reinforcement learning (RL) primarily refines high‑level decision‑making behaviors that orchestrate pre‑trained low‑level skills, rather than teaching new domain‑specific skills from scratch. It proposes River, a training recipe that enhances reward quality by filtering low‑quality synthetic environments and adding process‑level behavior regularization. Using River, RL‑trained agents outperform other open‑source 8B models on four terminal‑agent benchmarks, achieving significant gains with fewer than 30% of the training environments.