arXiv Computation and Language By Han Zhu, Jiale Chen, Chengkun Cai, Shengjie Sun, Haoran Li, Yujin Zhou, Chi-Min Chan, Pengcheng Wen, Lei Li, Yike Guo, Sirui Han

Towards Multi-modal Multi-turn Safety: From Agentic Interaction to Strategic Alignment

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces MINT‑Safe, a new open‑source dataset of 11,270 multi‑image dialogues and 500 refusal VQA pairs designed to expose safety risks in multi‑modal large language models during open‑ended conversations. It also proposes TAD‑Align, a turn‑aware dual‑objective reward framework that dynamically up‑weights dialogue turns with inconsistent safety behavior, improving safety metrics on Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B‑Instruct and LLaVA‑Next‑7B. The results show over 10% reduction in attack success rate and notable gains in harmlessness and helpfulness while maintaining overall model performance.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Oct 16

When Reasoning Is Not Enough: Proactive Inquiry for Cross-Modal Safety in Multimodal Large Language Models

The paper introduces SAFE-PRO, a method for enhancing safety in multimodal large language models by proactively asking clarifying questions when cross‑modal ambiguity poses intent‑level risks. SAFE‑PRO employs a Risk‑Conditioned Uncertainty signal that blends predictive entropy with a learned cross‑modal risk score to guide both question‑asking and path optimization, prioritizing safety while reducing over‑refusal. The authors also present the SSUI‑Dialog dataset and demonstrate that SAFE‑PRO outperforms existing approaches, including GPT‑4o and Claude‑3.5‑Sonnet, across multiple benchmarks.

By Wei Cai, Jian Zhao, Yuchen Yuan, Xuelong Li
arXiv AI
Aug 24

ReFrame: Evidence-Guided Test-Time Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models

ReFrame is a training‑free framework that enhances safety alignment for multimodal large language models at test time. It uses two lightweight agents: one generates risk and utility evidence, and the other rewrites prompts and routes images to create a safe proxy before invoking the deployed MLLM. Experiments show that ReFrame improves jailbreak defense, safety awareness, and reduces over‑sensitivity while maintaining multimodal utility.

By Wenzheng Jiang, Xuankun Rong, Yuanzhao Zhai, Dawei Feng, Huaimin Wang
arXiv AI
5d ago

Compositional Unalignment: Auditing Safety in Large Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces the concept of compositional unalignment to audit safety in large vision‑language models (LVLMs). It shows that minimal fine‑tuning can match reinforcement‑learning benchmarks, yet recognition and refusal of compositional harm are decoupled, revealing fragility in safety mechanisms. The authors propose CMaG, a training‑free method that uses a refusal‑versus‑compliance log‑probability margin to identify cross‑modal interactions, and demonstrate that a single backward pass can significantly reduce safety scores while preserving coherence.

By Hong kyu Lee, Kai Shu, Li Xiong
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 22

SingGuard: A Policy-Adaptive Multimodal LLM Guardrail with Dynamic Reasoning

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in consumer, medical, financial, and enterprise applications. This broad deployment expands the safety surface: risks can arise from multimodal question answering, assistant responses, and cross-modal composition, while moderation policies may vary across products, regions, and deployment stages.