arXiv AI By Changxi Wen, Shuning Zhang, Bohao Chu, Yuwei Chuai, Hui Wang, Dai Shi, Xin Yi, Hewu Li

Towards Multi-Agent-Simulation-Based Community Note Evaluation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 18268v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Community-based fact-checking that relies on cross-consensus is expanding rapidly on social media platforms.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 1

How Human Feedback Shapes AI-generated Community Notes

arXiv:2606. 30905v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Community Notes, a bridging-based crowd-sourced fact-checking system, has emerged as a new mechanism for moderating misleading information on social media and has been adopted by major platforms including X, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and TikTok.

By Soham De, Isaac Slaughter, Jiawei Guo, Qiao-Yun Cheng, Jiayuan Yan, Sruti Banerjee, Martin Saveski
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3

Gaming Consensus: Coordinated Manipulation in Crowdsourced Fact-Checking

arXiv:2607. 01824v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Crowdsourced fact-checking systems have been adopted by major social media companies such as X, Meta, TikTok and Google with the aim of combating misleading information at scale without relying on centralized editorial control.

By Nikil Roashan Selvam, Jay Baxter, Sophie Hilgard, Brad Miller, Keith Coleman, Ellen Vitercik, Sanmi Koyejo
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 2

Gaming Consensus: Coordinated Manipulation in Crowdsourced Fact-Checking

Crowdsourced fact-checking systems have been adopted by major social media companies such as X, Meta, TikTok and Google with the aim of combating misleading information at scale without relying on centralized editorial control. These systems have been developed around a common underlying concept: a bridging mechanism that identifies notes flagging misleading information when they receive support from people with different perspectives rather than simple majority support.

arXiv AI
Jun 15

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

arXiv:2606. 14516v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress.

By Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Anastassia Kornilova, Jon Crall, Tommaso Cerruti, Yanan Long, Yifan Mai, Sanchit Ahuja, Asaf Yehudai, Marek \v{S}uppa, John P. Lalor, Oluwagbemike Olowe, Jatin Ganhotra, Brian H. Hu, Eliya Habba, Andrew M. Bean, Chang Liu, Sander Land, Steven Dillmann, Aniketh Garikaparthi, Elron Bandel, Saki Imai, James Edgell, Wm. Matthew Kennedy, Jenny Chim, Patrick Meusling, Asteria Kaeberlein, Venkata Ramachandra Karthik Chundi, Manasi Patwardhan, Martin Ku, Austin Meek, Leon Knauer, Brian Wingenroth, Srishti Yadav, Usman Gohar, Felix Friedrich, Michelle Lin, Jennifer Mickel, Arman Cohan, Stella Biderman, Irene Solaiman, Zeerak Talat, Anka Reuel, Mubashara Akhtar, Gjergji Kasneci, Avijit Ghosh, Leshem Choshen