arXiv Machine Learning By Nikil Roashan Selvam, Jay Baxter, Sophie Hilgard, Brad Miller, Keith Coleman, Ellen Vitercik, Sanmi Koyejo

Gaming Consensus: Coordinated Manipulation in Crowdsourced Fact-Checking

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 01824v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Crowdsourced fact-checking systems have been adopted by major social media companies such as X, Meta, TikTok and Google with the aim of combating misleading information at scale without relying on centralized editorial control.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 2

Gaming Consensus: Coordinated Manipulation in Crowdsourced Fact-Checking

Crowdsourced fact-checking systems have been adopted by major social media companies such as X, Meta, TikTok and Google with the aim of combating misleading information at scale without relying on centralized editorial control. These systems have been developed around a common underlying concept: a bridging mechanism that identifies notes flagging misleading information when they receive support from people with different perspectives rather than simple majority support.

arXiv AI
Jul 1

How Human Feedback Shapes AI-generated Community Notes

arXiv:2606. 30905v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Community Notes, a bridging-based crowd-sourced fact-checking system, has emerged as a new mechanism for moderating misleading information on social media and has been adopted by major platforms including X, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and TikTok.

By Soham De, Isaac Slaughter, Jiawei Guo, Qiao-Yun Cheng, Jiayuan Yan, Sruti Banerjee, Martin Saveski
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Why Does Misinformation Propagate Faster? An Algorithmic Perspective on X

The paper investigates why misinformation spreads more quickly on engagement‑based platforms by dissecting the recommendation algorithm of X. It identifies an engagement fungibility mechanism that rewards instant reactions (likes, retweets) over thoughtful engagement (replies, quotes), allowing misinformation—which tends to attract instant reactions—to receive more recommendations. The authors validate this mechanism through a simulation on the USC X 2024 election corpus, showing that adjusting metric weights has little effect, while requiring thoughtful engagement before amplification can significantly reduce the credibility exposure gap without harming mainstream content or engagement.

By Pan Li, Shuang Gao
arXiv AI
Sep 2

CoVer: Conflict-Aware Claim Verification

arXiv:2609.00508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Social media fact-checking has long been challenged by evidence-level and aggregation-level conflicts, where erroneous evidence mimics authoritative ne...

By Shuning Zhang, Dai Shi, Bohao Chu, Hui Wang, Yuwei Chuai, Yifan Wang, Jingruo Chen, Simin Li, Xin Yi, Hewu Li