arXiv AI

Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

arXiv:2607. 13045v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a key paradigm for privacy-preserving collaborative model training across distributed and heterogeneous data sources.

arXiv AI
Jul 17

Towards a Unified Multidimensional Explainability Metric: Evaluating Trustworthiness in AI Models

arXiv:2607. 14315v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for assessing the explainability of various XAI methods, such as LIME and SHAP, across multiple datasets and machine learning models, with the ultimate goal of creating a unified multidimensional explainability score.

By Georgios Makridis, Georgios Fatouros, Athanasios Kiourtis, Dimitrios Kotios, Vasileios Koukos, Dimosthenis Kyriazis, Jonh Soldatos
arXiv AI
Jun 30

Towards Harnessing the Collaborative Power of Large and Small Models for Domain Tasks

arXiv:2504. 17421v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LMs) offer broad generalization capabilities but require vast amounts of data and computational resources for domain-specific tasks; small models (SMs), in contrast, are more efficient and tailored to specific domains yet lack general-purpose coverage.

By Yang Liu, Kejia Zhang, Bingjie Yan, Tianyuan Zou, Jianqing Zhang, Zixuan Gu, Xiangsen Chen, Jianbing Ding, Xidong Wang, Jingyi Li, Xiaozhou Ye, Ye Ouyang, Qiang Yang, Ya-Qin Zhang
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Privacy-Preserving Heterogeneous Multi-LLM Federated Inference for Cognitive Diagnosis

The paper introduces a federated inference framework that enables multiple commercial large language model (LLM) APIs—such as LLaMA‑3.3‑70B, GPT‑4o‑mini, and Claude‑3‑Haiku—to collaborate on cognitive diagnosis tasks without accessing raw student data or proprietary model internals. Each entity’s predictions are perturbed with Laplace noise to provide epsilon‑local differential privacy, and a residual‑based aggregation scheme mitigates model heterogeneity. Experiments on three educational benchmarks demonstrate strong privacy guarantees with minimal accuracy loss, confirming the framework’s practical usability and cross‑domain generalizability.

By Yagna Manasa Boyapati, Chong Yu, Tianyu Jiang, Justin Zhan
arXiv AI
Aug 17

Federated Prompt Learning: A Unified Framework, Empirical Analysis, and Future Directions

arXiv:2608. 13844v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become core components of cloud-based intelligent services in academia and industry, yet their training and deployment are hindered by high computational costs, data centralization, and privacy concerns.

By Qinglin Yang, Chen Qiu, Hongyuan Zhang, Pengdeng Li, Yuan Liu, Zhihong Tian
arXiv AI
2d ago

Federated Agent Optimization

The paper introduces Federated Agent Optimization (FAO), a framework for enabling large language model agents to improve collaboratively while keeping raw data, trajectories, and private knowledge local. FAO treats agent capabilities—such as memory, tools, rewards, skills, and structured knowledge—as a multi‑objective optimization space that balances utility, privacy leakage, and communication cost. It outlines methods for abstracting, protecting, aggregating, and adapting private experience into transferable capabilities, and highlights key challenges and future research directions for trustworthy federated agent systems.

By Qiang Yang, Zhiqiang Kou, Xueyi Zhang, Dong-Dong Wu, Hanlin Gu, Jing Guo, Yang Liu, Di Jiang, Qian Xu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

SoK: Privacy Attacks on Machine Learning via Explainable AI

The paper surveys 25 studies that use explainable AI to compromise machine learning models, covering attacks such as model extraction, membership inference, and model inversion. It distinguishes between how explanations are obtained—through target releases, attacker-derived methods, secondary disclosure, privileged access, or global artifacts—and shows that explanations can lower extraction costs and reveal membership signals via statistics, recourse distance, and robustness. The authors compare threat models, signals, and defenses, concluding that no single explanation type is always unsafe and that protection must be tailored to the specific acquisition path and target asset.

By Abdullah Caglar Oksuz, Anisa Halimi, Erman Ayday