arXiv AI By Zhiruo Zhou, Zelin Li, Xiwen Chen, Jiazhuo Li, Chenwei Wang, Huiming Chen, Xiaojun Zhu

Think Only When Needed: Prompt-Authority Control for Selective Slow-Path Intervention in Vision-Language-Action Manipulation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2

When Instructions Retrieve Trajectories: Diagnosing and Mitigating Generalization Failures in VLA Models

The paper investigates a specific failure mode in vision‑language‑action models, termed instruction‑action binding, where models respond to language and vision separately but fail to combine them to select the correct action under counterfactual changes. Through behavioral analyses of fine‑tuned policies, the authors show that failed rollouts often preserve source behavior or switch to other demonstrated tasks, indicating that language is not ignored but mis‑bound. They propose Equivariant Counterfactual Training (ECT), which supplies counterfactual demonstrations and a paired loss to enforce correct action selection, achieving significant performance gains across simulated and real‑world benchmarks.

By Hung-Jen Chen, Yu-Hsun Hou, Yan-Hong Chen, Yan-Fu Chen, Binghua Cai, Min Sun, Chun-Yi Lee
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

CARE: Certifying Acceleration for Vision-Language-Action Inference

The paper introduces CARE, a method for certifying accelerated inference in vision‑language‑action models. CARE uses paired rollouts on a calibration set to guarantee that the risk of acceleration‑induced failure stays below a user‑specified budget, selecting the fastest certified accelerator or falling back to the reference policy. Experiments on LIBERO suites show that CARE achieves 9.0–10.8× speedups while preserving at least 85.8% of reference‑solved episodes with 95% confidence, and it outperforms non‑guaranteed selectors in both budget adherence and rollout efficiency.

By Rui Liu, Tong Zheng, Jindong Gu, Zhipeng Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 26

When "Must" Becomes "Maybe": Constraint Weakening in LLM Agent Workflows

Large language model agents coordinate tasks via multi‑role, multi‑stage workflows that transform upstream state into intermediate artifacts such as summaries and plans. The study shows that when these artifacts are transformed—through compression, plan assimilation, or other handoff methods—the strict action‑binding constraints on upstream state can be weakened, turning mandatory requirements into optional information. In 1,296 synthetic episodes, direct handoff preserved all safety blockers, whereas transformed handoffs frequently deactivated or forbidden actions, but restoring full state fields or applying downstream verification can recover preservation.

By Yiheng Sun, Huifei Wang, Yancheng Zhu, Zhenyu Li, Zebin Zhao, Yifan Yuan