arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

Evolving with Open Worlds: Towards Recursive Self-Improvement for Future Forecasting

arXiv:2610.29784v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) systems are released with frozen parameters and improve through external updates, whereas an ideal syste...

By Zhipeng Chen, Yunsen Liang, Yanxi Chen, Hongkang Zhao, Lingyun Feng, Ruiyang Ren, Guoxin Chen, Jia Deng, Feng Chang, Chuan Hao, Ran Tao, Jian Yang, Ji-Rong Wen, Bryan Dai, Wayne Xin Zhao
arXiv AI
Jun 26

The Red Queen G\"odel Machine: Co-Evolving Agents and Their Evaluators

arXiv:2606. 26294v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-improving agents are state-of-the-art (SOTA) on agentic coding benchmarks and have recently been extended to general domains.

By Alex Iacob, Andrej Jovanovi\'c, William F. Shen, Daniel Burkhardt, Meghdad Kurmanji, Nurbek Tastan, Lorenzo Sani, Niccol\`o Alberto Elia Venanzi, Ambroise Odonnat, Zeyu Cao, Bill Marino, Xinchi Qiu, Nicholas D. Lane
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

FreeEvolve: Learning to Evolve Beyond Fixed Loops

FREEEVOLVE automates the optimization loop used by agent evolvers, allowing the system to decide what to test, how much evidence to gather, which candidates to pursue, and when to stop, all within specified resource limits. By treating these decisions as an editable evolution skill and improving them through meta‑evolution, the method learns a capability that replaces hand‑crafted search loops. Experiments on several benchmarks show that FREEEVOLVE improves primary metrics by an average of 13.6 points and that meta‑evolved skills add further gains, indicating transferability across environments.

By Lecheng Kong, Like Hui, Nikos Kanakaris, Prithwish Jana, Sahika Genc, Narayanan Sadagopan
arXiv AI
6d ago

Forging More Tasks into Better Harnesses: Agentic Harness Evolution via Successive Scale Racing

The paper introduces Successive Scale Racing (SSR), a framework that improves agentic harness evolution by adaptively selecting optimal evidence combinations during each evolution round. SSR constructs diverse evidence sets based on task quality and coverage, then efficiently races candidate harnesses under a limited compute budget. Across three benchmarks, SSR outperforms baselines, steadily raising pass rates as the task pool expands from 40 to 200 while cutting validation executions by 60%.

By Jingzhe Liu, Jiliang Tang, Tong Zhao, Neil Shah, Clark Mingxuan Ju