arXiv Machine Learning By Myeongseob Ko, Feiyang Kang, Weiyan Shi, Ming Jin, Zhou Yu, Ruoxi Jia

The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passes

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2402. 08922v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large-scale black-box models have become ubiquitous across numerous applications.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Data Attribution at Scale via Influence Matrix Estimation

Data Attribution at Scale via Influence Matrix Estimation proposes a scalable approach to quantify how individual training examples influence a model’s predictions. The authors introduce two algorithms, MAGE and SPELL, that reconstruct an influence matrix from a limited number of measurements without extra computational cost, improving over existing baselines across various training scales and budgets.

By Yuxi Chen, Hamza Golubovic, Han Tong, Arian Maleki, Andrew Ilyas
arXiv AI
3d ago

Distilling Diffusion Score Discrepancy for Efficient Training Data Attribution

The paper introduces a new method for training data attribution in diffusion models called TID, which uses a local score discrepancy measure and can be estimated without retraining. It further distills this approach into TIDE, a forward‑only student that reproduces the teacher’s rankings using internal activations, achieving comparable accuracy at dramatically lower query cost. Experiments on CIFAR‑10, ArtBench‑10, and MS‑COCO show that TID outperforms existing methods and TIDE attributes samples in milliseconds, faster than generation itself.

By Shixuan Liu, Joan Serr\`a, Kin Wai Cheuk, Jinju Kim, Woosung Choi, Yukara Ikemiya, Wei-Hsiang Liao, Jiaqi W. Ma, Yuki Mitsufuji
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

Probing for Knowledge Attribution in Large Language Models

The paper introduces a method for identifying the dominant knowledge source behind large language model (LLM) outputs, distinguishing between faithfulness violations (misuse of provided context) and factuality violations (errors in internal knowledge). A simple linear probe trained on hidden representations can reliably classify this source, and the authors present AttriWiki, a self‑supervised pipeline that generates labeled training data by prompting models to recall withheld entities or read them from context. Probes trained on AttriWiki achieve high Macro‑F1 scores across several models and datasets, generalize zero‑shot to a benchmark, and show that attribution mismatches can increase error rates by up to 70%. "whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates that knowing the source of an LLM’s answer is crucial for effective mitigation of hallucinations, as attribution mismatches significantly raise error rates."

By Ivo Brink, Alexander Boer, Dennis Ulmer