arXiv:2607. 01775v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Discrete diffusion models have steadily improved in quality relative to autoregressive (AR) models.
By Marianne Arriola, Volodymyr Kuleshov
PlaidQ is a 0.7B continuous diffusion language model designed for code generation. By distilling its iterative refinement trajectory into only a few denoising steps—or even a single step—PlaidQ achieves competitive performance with discrete diffusion models while dramatically reducing inference time. The study demonstrates that continuous diffusion can be effectively compressed, enabling efficient and accurate code generation with minimal computational overhead.
By Fred Zhangzhi Peng, Kaiwen Zheng, Anru R. Zhang
The paper introduces Clock Diffusion, a framework for semi‑autoregressive continuous diffusion language models that incorporates position‑dependent noise schedules, efficient training, and sampling algorithms. It presents two generation modes—block and sliding window—and defines ClockDLMs, a family of Gaussian models that achieve state‑of‑the‑art diffusion likelihoods on OpenWebText and outperform continuous baselines on GSM8K while matching or exceeding discrete diffusion models. The authors also propose Cache Grab, a set of efficient samplers that adapt accelerated inference techniques from discrete diffusion to further improve model quality and efficiency.
By Yair Schiff, Omer Belhasin, Roy Uziel, Matan Rusanovsky, Ran Zilberstein, Marianne Arriola, Gilad Turok, Guanghan Wang, Volodymyr Kuleshov, Michael Elad
arXiv:2607. 28166v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion language models expose a provisional prediction at every denoising step, and on many tasks the candidate answer inside it stabilizes before the step schedule is exhausted.
By Chia-Ming Lee, Shao-Kai Liu, Ming-Ching Chang, Xin Li, Yu-Lun Liu, Chih-Chung Hsu
arXiv:2606. 20560v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM reasoning transparency is a critical affordance for understanding model decisions, mitigating misuse and misalignment, and debugging surprising model behaviors.
By Joshua Engels, Callum McDougall, Bilal Chughtai, Janos Kramar, Senthoran Rajamanoharan, Cindy Wu, Arthur Conmy, Asic Q Chen, Jean Tarbouriech, Min Ma, Brendan O'Donoghue, Jo\~ao Gabriel Lopes de Oliveira, Rohin Shah, Neel Nanda
The paper introduces the first controlled benchmark for optimizers in discrete diffusion models, evaluating seven optimizers (AdamW, Lion, Muon, SOAP, MARS, MARS‑M, Schedule‑Free) across four diffusion formulations: masked diffusion on text8, uniform diffusion on QM9 and LM1B, and Gaussian diffusion on CelebA‑64. Each optimizer undergoes the same search protocol and is retrained with full budget and multiple seeds, revealing that AdamW, while strong, is not universally optimal and that optimizers validated on autoregressive language models (Muon, MARS‑M, SOAP) can outperform tuned AdamW on certain tasks.
By Arman Bolatov, Egor Shulgin, David Li, Abduragim Shtanchaev, Sebastian U. Stich, Maxim Panov, Eric Moulines, Peter Richt\'arik, Martin Tak\'a\v{c}