arXiv:2607. 04034v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The language models that underpin agents have seen a rapid rise in performance on function calling benchmarks.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 10430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed as AI agents frequently exhibit user specification-grounding failures, executing hallucinated, undesired actions to force a resolution rather than expressing uncertainty.
arXiv:2609.38962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work on hallucination detection in large language models has shown that, for a fixed pre-trained model and reasoning task, it is possible to est...
arXiv:2507. 06722v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding how large language models (LLMs) internally represent and process their predictions is central to detecting uncertainty and preventing hallucinations.
arXiv:2607. 17883v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprises will not deploy AI agents they cannot trust, and the most-cited reason for distrust is hallucination: confident, fluent output that is simply not true.
arXiv:2609.35804v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, leading to their widespread deployment...
arXiv:2601.22984v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diagnosing failure patterns in Deep Research Agents (DRAs) remains a critical challenge. Existing benchmarks predominantly rely on end-to-end evalu...