arXiv Machine Learning By John Sweeney

The Geometry of Sequential Learning: Lie-Bracket Prediction of Transfer Order

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 24993v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential learning is order-dependent: from Pile-style next-token domain adaptation to instruction-SFT and DPO, N candidate sources induce N!

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

Pairwise Ranking Outperforms Single-Action RL for Offline Explanation Selection: A Practical Lesson

The paper presents a cost‑effective approach for industrial explainable‑recommendation systems by decoupling explanation generation from selection. Candidate explanations are pre‑generated using six prompt styles and two commodity LLMs, then a lightweight CPU‑resident selector (e.g., LambdaRank) chooses the best one at request time, achieving sub‑100 ms latency without GPUs. Experiments on a 2,958‑pair Google Local subset and a 300‑pair MovieLens‑1M split show that pairwise ranking methods outperform single‑action RL baselines, while KG‑path selectors achieve near‑perfect user satisfaction scores.

By Tanay Chowdhury, Saeideh Shahrokh Esfahani
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Score the Update, Not the Token: Descent-Aligned Routing for Combinatorial LoRA Experts

The paper introduces VANE, a new routing strategy for Mixture-of-LoRA-experts that scores experts based on the expected loss reduction of their updates rather than token similarity. By decomposing each expert into a reader and writer, VANE evaluates all reader–writer pairs using a low‑rank compass that predicts the descent direction, enabling efficient top‑k selection with additive gates. Experiments on Llama‑3 models show VANE outperforms twelve PEFT and MoE‑LoRA baselines while using fewer trainable parameters and providing router scores that better reflect expert usefulness.

By Priya Nair, Lukas Brenner, Maya Lindqvist, Daniel Whitmore, Wen-Hsuan Liu, Tom Saliencro, Amara Okonkwo, Rohan Desai
arXiv AI
6d ago

OptiSelect: How does the Optimizer Shape Data Curriculum?

OptiSelect is a framework that incorporates the optimizer’s effect into online data selection for large language model pretraining. The study shows that optimizers like Lion and Muon, which use sign-based or polar-tangential preconditioners, suffer from a discriminability collapse that limits selection gains, whereas diagonal‑adaptive optimizers such as AdamW and Sophia can achieve higher gains. Experiments on 124M and 720M models confirm the theory and demonstrate that OptiSelect remains effective even when data is rephrased.

By Simin Fan, Alireza Abdollahpoorrostam, Martin Jaggi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Pairwise Ranking Outperforms Single-Action RL for Offline Explanation Selection: A Practical Lesson

The paper presents a cost‑effective approach for industrial explainable‑recommendation systems by decoupling explanation generation from selection. Explanations are pre‑generated using six prompt styles and two commodity LLMs, then a lightweight CPU‑resident selector (e.g., LambdaRank) chooses the best one at request time, achieving sub‑100 ms latency without GPUs. Experiments on a 2,958‑pair Google Local subset and a 300‑pair MovieLens‑1M split show that pairwise ranking outperforms single‑action RL methods, while KG‑path selectors achieve near‑perfect unique‑output rates, and the overall end‑to‑end build cost is around $15 on commodity hardware.