arXiv AI By HyunJin Kim, Jaejun Shim, Young Jin Kim, JinYeong Bak

Temporal Preference Optimization for Unsupervised Retrieval

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 17664v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unsupervised dense retrievers offer scalability by learning semantic similarity from unlabeled documents via contrastive learning, but they struggle to capture the temporal relevance, retrieving semantically related but temporally misaligned documents-an important aspect when a document collection spans multiple time periods (e.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 24

TEMPS: Temporal Sentence Embeddings for Temporal Information Retrieval

The paper introduces TEMPS, a modular temporal branch that enhances semantic retrievers by adding a temporal scoring component. TEMPS resolves anchored temporal expressions into intervals, matches them to Gaussian distributions, and trains an anchor-date-conditioned encoder using grounding supervision without hand‑labeled data. On three temporal benchmarks, TEMPS improves MRR across all tested backbones and raises R@1 from 19.92 to 25.39 on the TS‑Retriever, surpassing prior temporal state‑of‑the‑art methods.

By Mourad Hassani, Julien Romero, Amel Bouzeghoub, Christian Jacquelinet
arXiv AI
Aug 19

DEPT: Document Embedding Preservation Tuning for Unified Query Expansion and Retrieval

The paper introduces DEPT, a method that trains a single decoder-only large language model to both expand queries and encode documents for retrieval. By preserving document embeddings close to their initial cached values while allowing gradients to flow through the generator, DEPT stabilizes retrieval targets and enables efficient index reuse and online hard‑negative mining. Experiments on the BEIR benchmark with Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507 and LLaMA‑3.2‑3B‑Instruct show that DEPT outperforms training‑free, independently trained, and staged unified baselines, with ablations confirming the benefits of preservation, whitening, end‑to‑end expansion training, and online negatives.

By Jingyuan Wang, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie, Mingxin Li, Yanzhao Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Which Histories Matter for Time Series Forecasting? Learning Predictive Relevance with Future Supervision

The paper investigates which historical examples are most useful for time‑series forecasting by defining predictive relevance as the expected future utility conditioned on inference‑time information. It introduces a two‑stage approach: a normalized‑pattern retriever generates a coarse candidate set, and a lightweight MLP reranks these candidates using future‑supervised relevance while keeping inference strictly past‑only. Experiments on six benchmarks show that this reranker improves pattern retrieval and outperforms a matched‑protocol baseline, revealing that historical relevance is structured, domain‑dependent, and not governed by a single universal retrieval rule.

By Yong-Hoon Choi, Kwang-Hyun Park, Youngjin Cho