arXiv AI By Ashish Acharya, Anish Khatiwada, Rohit Khadka, Pragya Aryal

TeamHerald@CHIPSAL 2026: Hate Speech Detection and Sentiment Analysis of Nepali Memes using Transformer-based Architectures and Ensemble Learning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 08770v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The analysis of internet memes in the Nepali language is complicated by frequent code-mixing and a lack of established baseline resources.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

AHA-Memes: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Benchmark for Understanding Hate in Arabic Memes

Hateful memes are a growing form of multimodal online harm, where hostile intent is often conveyed through the joint interpretation of images, text, cultural references, and implicit targets. While hateful meme detection has advanced in high-resource languages, Arabic remains underexplored, with existing meme resources focusing mainly on propaganda or coarse harmful-content labels.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

An Explainable DistilBERT-BiLSTM-Attention Framework for Binary and Multi-Class Hate Speech Detection

The paper presents an explainable hate‑speech detection framework that combines DistilBERT embeddings, a Bi‑LSTM network, and an attention mechanism to capture contextual and sequential information. It uses LIME to highlight influential text features, providing transparency in predictions. Evaluated on two benchmark datasets for both binary and multi‑class tasks, the model achieves F1‑scores of 96.78%–99.53% for binary classification and 94.99%–97.00% for multi‑class classification, outperforming existing baselines.

By Rameesha Zia, Muhammad Shahid Iqbal Malik
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 28

MexHat: A Dataset for Hate Speech Detection in Mexican Spanish Videos

MexHat is a newly released video dataset aimed at improving hate‑speech detection in Mexican Spanish. It contains roughly 1,000 clips annotated for three broad categories—no negative content, offensive content, and hate‑speech—as well as a finer classification into three hate‑speech sub‑categories. The paper presents dataset statistics and baseline results, underscoring the challenges of detecting culturally and contextually nuanced hate speech in multimodal content.

By Itzel Tlelo-Coyotecatl, Hugo Jair Escalante