arXiv Computation and Language September 22, 2026 By Antonela Tommasel, Juan Manuel Rodriguez

Team DArgk at the 2026 ELOQUENT lab for evaluating generative language model quality: Residuals of Humanity: AI Detection Evasion via GRPO Fine-Tuning

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI

Jul 16

UTS at ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff: structural shifts in AI writing bypass state-of-the-art detectors

arXiv:2607. 13565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate which language model evasion attacks survive state-of-the-art adversarial fine-tuning, developing strategies that sweep the top 5 positions on the ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff leaderboard.

By Dima Galat, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu

llms fine-tuning benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 23

Co-Evolving LLM Evaluators and Policies via DynamicRubric

arXiv:2607. 20083v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training with evaluator feedback on policy-induced samples serves as a major mechanism for improving large language models.

By Beining Wang, Weihang Su, Hongtao Tian, Hao Kong, Tao Yang, Ting Yao, Qingyi Pan, Yueyue Wu, Qingyao Ai, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu

llms reinforcement-learning

arXiv AI

Aug 12

Evaluation-Conditioned Training: Teaching Models to Generalize to Stronger Oversight Regimes

arXiv:2608. 10209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Feedback signals used to train Large Language Models (LLMs) are the primary driver of their behavior and our main lever for instilling alignment with human values and objectives.

By Alec Harris, Kasey Corra, Archie Chaudhury, Yixiong Hao

llms reinforcement-learning fine-tuning safety

arXiv AI

Jun 19

AAPA: Adversarially Anchored Preference Alignment for Post-Training of Large Language Models

arXiv:2509. 25148v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Post-training alignment of large language models often combines supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on expert demonstrations with reinforcement learning (RL) from preference or verifiable feedback.

By Faqiang Qian, Kang An, Weikun Zhang, Ziliang Wang, Xuhui Zheng, Liangjian Wen, Yong Dai, Mengya Gao, Yichao Wu

llms reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jun 2

Detector-Evasive LLM Paraphrasing via Constrained Policy Optimization

arXiv:2606. 00392v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-text detectors are vulnerable to paraphrasing and detector-guided paraphrasing attacks, but existing detector-evasion methods often lack precise control over semantic preservation.

By Mingyi Wang, Zhuoer Shen, Yuheng Bu, Shaofeng Zou

llms reinforcement-learning

arXiv AI

Jul 24

Robust Critics: Defending LLMs Against Multi-Turn Attacks

arXiv:2607. 20472v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a user asks a language model something harmful, is it a genuine attack or a misunderstood but well-meaning question?

By Roman Belaire, Arunesh Sinha, Pradeep Varakantham

llms reinforcement-learning fine-tuning safety

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

UTS at ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff: structural shifts in AI writing bypass state-of-the-art detectors

Co-Evolving LLM Evaluators and Policies via DynamicRubric

Evaluation-Conditioned Training: Teaching Models to Generalize to Stronger Oversight Regimes

AAPA: Adversarially Anchored Preference Alignment for Post-Training of Large Language Models

Detector-Evasive LLM Paraphrasing via Constrained Policy Optimization

Robust Critics: Defending LLMs Against Multi-Turn Attacks