arXiv:2605. 26012v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents commonly rely on high-dimensional neural representations, despite growing evidence that task-relevant value and policy structure may be intrinsically low-dimensional.
By Aleksandar Todorov, Matthia Sabatelli
arXiv:2606. 18469v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neuroscientific research has revealed that the brain encodes complex behaviors by leveraging structured, low-dimensional manifolds and dynamically fusing multiple sources of information through adaptive gating mechanisms.
By Somjit Nath, Jackson J Cone, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou
arXiv:2609.38598v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Partially observable environments pose a fundamental challenge in deep reinforcement learning, requiring agents to compress temporal information from o...
By Sathya Kamesh Bhethanabhotla, Efstratios Gavves, Andr\'e Biedenkapp
arXiv:2510. 19244v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (RL) achieves remarkable performance but lacks interpretability, limiting trust in policy behavior.
By Yiyu Qian, Su Nguyen, Chao Chen, Qinyue Zhou, Liyuan Zhao
arXiv:2602. 12643v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present Unified Latent Dynamics (ULD), a novel reinforcement learning algorithm that unifies the efficiency of model-free methods with the representational strengths of model-based approaches, without incurring planning overhead.
By Jashaswimalya Acharjee, Balaraman Ravindran
The paper introduces a neurosymbolic world model that separates observation reconstruction from reward prediction, enabling the model to adapt zero‑shot to new reward functions defined over a shared symbolic state space. This approach addresses the task‑dependency of traditional neural world models, which learn latent representations tied to specific training tasks. Experiments show that the neurosymbolic formulation generalises more strongly than purely neural methods.
By Isidoro Tamassia, Lennert De Smet, Giuseppe Marra