arXiv AI By Tianqiao Zhao, Meng Yue, Jianhui Wang

Task-Conditional Faithfulness Auditing of Multimodal LLMs for Grid Diagnosis

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 24539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (LLMs) can combine topology, measurements, and incident text for grid diagnosis, yet answer accuracy does not establish that task-appropriate evidence was used.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 16

EviScope: Paired Counterfactual Evidence Diagnostics for Faithful and Efficient Grounded Language Models

EviScope is a new paired counterfactual benchmark that evaluates grounded language models by fixing the question while manipulating evidence—adding, removing, distracting, or contradicting it. The v1.1 dataset includes 40 four‑condition quartets with repaired counterfactual claims and span‑level support labels for automated assessment. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑7B, Llama 3.1 8B, and Gemini 3.5 Flash show that paired metrics reveal grounding behaviors hidden by simple answer accuracy, such as unsupported answers, conflict blindness, and incorrect non‑answer actions.

By Suryadeep Singh Deswal
arXiv AI
Sep 4

InSituMeasure: Probing Situated Measurement Grounding in Industrial Scenes with Multimodal Large Language Models

InSituMeasure is a new benchmark that tests multimodal large language models on situated measurement tasks in industrial scenes. It includes 2,922 real monitoring images of eight types of engineering instruments, with detailed gauge-attribute labels and noise tags for failure diagnosis. The benchmark defines metrics for numerical accuracy, unit consistency, rejection of unanswerable queries, and alignment of model failures with annotated error factors, revealing that even the best models achieve only 25.7% joint value‑unit accuracy and 51.8% confidence‑diagnosis F1.

By Chao Shen, Xinyuan Li, Yunfan Zhou, Jianguo Yao, Haibing Guan, Zhihai Wang, Xijun Li
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Confidently Wrong, Silently So: Auditing Undetectable Failures of a Deployed On-Device Language Model

The paper audits a developer‑accessible on‑device language model, revealing that it can confidently produce incorrect answers while refusing benign prompts, a phenomenon termed task‑asymmetric miscalibration. The model’s confident outputs are surface‑indistinguishable, with classifiers based on user‑visible features failing to separate correct from wrong responses. The authors propose a model‑agnostic audit protocol, a surface‑indistinguishability test, and a black‑box consistency wrapper that improves reliability without requiring model access.

By Shashwat Pandey, Satwik Pandey, Suresh Raghu