arXiv:2607. 10077v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular learning is still dominated by gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs), while recent deep learning approaches have become increasingly competitive.
By Jiaqi Luo, Shixin Xu
Inherently interpretable classifiers for tabular data typically rely on sparse features, rules, or patterns that users can inspect directly. The marginal feature-screening step common to these methods can discard variables whose predictive value emerges only through joint configurations with other variables.
arXiv:2607. 07060v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inherently interpretable classifiers for tabular data typically rely on sparse features, rules, or patterns that users can inspect directly.
By Srikumar Krishnamoorthy
arXiv:2606. 07345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, exemplified by TabPFN, perform prediction via in-context learning, inferring test labels directly from labeled training examples.
By Si-Yang Liu, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv:2605. 24417v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Supervised classification on tabular data remains a central machine learning task, but its dependence on large labeled datasets limits its applicability in data-scarce settings.
By Daria Grushina, Kseniia Kuvshinova, Alina Kostromina, Aziz Temirkhanov, Mile Mitrovic, Dmitry Simakov
arXiv:2608. 09162v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular data presents unique challenges for deep learning due to its heterogeneous nature, where numeric features exhibit diverse distributions, scales, and statistical properties.
By Zihao Ye, Juyong Kim, Johnna Sundberg, Burak Varici, Pradeep Ravikumar