arXiv Computation and Language By Tatsuya Ichinose, Youmi Ma, Masanari Oi, Ryuto Koike, Naoaki Okazaki

Synthesizing Instruction-Tuning Datasets with Contrastive Decoding

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces CoDIT, a contrastive decoding technique that separates instruction-following behavior from pre-trained world knowledge in large language models. By generating responses that emphasize post-training instruction capabilities while suppressing shared pre-trained knowledge, CoDIT creates instruction-tuning datasets that lead to consistently better model performance than directly generated responses or existing public datasets. The authors also provide theoretical and empirical evidence that CoDIT effectively distills instruction-tuning knowledge from model parameters into text, facilitating cross-architecture transfer.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

DKL: Decoupled Knowledge Learning for Instruction-Tuned Language Models

The paper introduces DKL, a method for adding new knowledge to instruction‑tuned language models without compromising their instruction‑following abilities. DKL performs extended pre‑training on a base LLM to embed knowledge, then merges these weights into the instruction‑tuned model, avoiding costly instruction fine‑tuning. Experiments show DKL raises RAG accuracy from 54.17% to 79.26% on retrieval failure cases while using far less training data than previous approaches.

By Kushagra Bhushan, Meghanadh Pulivarthi, Sai Krishna Reddy Sathi, Gaurav Pandey, Sonam Gupta, Vineet Kumar, Jaydeep Sen, Yatin Nandwani, Sachindra Joshi, Dinesh Raghu
arXiv AI
Sep 12

How LLMs Follow Instructions: Skillful Coordination, Not a Universal Mechanism

Instruction tuning is often thought to give language models a universal ability to follow instructions, but this study shows otherwise. By probing nine tasks across three models, the authors find that general probes reveal selective, not uniform, deficits, cross‑task transfer is weak and skill‑similar, and causal ablation uncovers sparse, asymmetric dependencies. The results suggest instruction following is a coordinated use of diverse linguistic skills rather than a single shared mechanism.

By Elisabetta Rocchetti, Alfio Ferrara