arXiv Machine LearningBy Yanqing Luo (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany), Julius Hense (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany), Niklas Preni{\ss}l (Institute of Pathology, Charit\'e Universit\"atsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, Berlin Institute of Health at Charit\'e -- Universit\"atsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charit\'e Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany), Andreas Mock (Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Division of Translational Medical Oncology, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany, NCT Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, German Cancer Consortium), Klaus-Robert M\"uller (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Seoul, Korea, Max-Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbr\"ucken, Germany), Thomas Schnake (Department of Chemistry, Chemical Physics Theory Group, University of Toronto, Canada, Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada, Acceleration Consortium, University of Toronto, Canada), Mina Jamshidi Idaji (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany)
Symb-xMIL: Symbolic Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning in Digital Pathology
arXiv:2606. 06224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explanations of multiple instance learning (MIL) models are widely used for validation and discovery in digital histopathology.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article
lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2608. 17370v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative models promise a route to explainable clinical AI: rather than probe a classifier, model the distributions of healthy and diseased patients and read explanations off the geometry between them.
arXiv:2512. 22240v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning models are primarily judged by predictive performance, especially in applied genomics, where explanations are read as biological findings.
arXiv:2608. 02803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Attention-based multiple instance learning (ABMIL) is the predominant approach for slide-level prediction in computational pathology, yet its attention maps provide only local explanations: they indicate where a model focuses but not which histological features drive its predictions or how the model behaves across a patient cohort.
By Abdallah Lamane, Abdul Rahman Diab, Ren-Chin Wu, William Lotter
arXiv:2604. 09737v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Structured prediction with large language models requires outputs that are label-accurate, ontology-constrained, structurally valid, and evidence-grounded under label imbalance and heterogeneous group difficulty.
By Samah Fodeh, Ganesh Puthiaraju, Elyas Irankhah, Afshan Khan, Sreeraj Ramachandran, Linhai Ma, Srivani Talakokkul, Sarah Schellhorn
arXiv:2510. 17532v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting cancer treatment outcomes requires models that are both accurate and interpretable, particularly in the presence of heterogeneous clinical data.
By Raghu Vamshi Hemadri, Geetha Krishna Guruju, Kristi Topollai, Anna Ewa Choromanska
arXiv:2607. 24730v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computer vision models have become highly effective for medical applications, yet their black-box nature continues to undermine clinician trust.
By Krithi Shailya, Ananya Lakshmi Ravi, Venkatanathan K. V., Sowmya S. Sundaram, Gokul S. Krishnan, Aditi Anand, Balaraman Ravindran