arXiv:2512. 01461v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model merging has emerged as a promising paradigm for enabling multi-task capabilities without additional training.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2606. 22589v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ever since the advent of foundation models and the pre-training-finetuning paradigm, there have been numerous efforts to merge multiple task-specific experts into a single multi-task model.
arXiv:2606. 18627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model merging has emerged as a training-free alternative to multi-task learning, aiming to combine multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model.
The paper introduces a new multi‑task model‑merging framework that tackles task interference by projecting task vectors into a high‑dimensional sparse feature space using Sparse Autoencoders, enabling feature‑level disentanglement before fusion. It also proposes a lightweight Group‑Ranked Zeroth‑Order Optimizer to identify task‑critical layers for selective merging, reducing computational overhead. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑1.5B and Qwen2.5‑7B show consistent performance gains over several baselines across reasoning, code generation, instruction following, and general knowledge tasks, with a 2.78% improvement in a highly conflicting four‑task setting.
Model merging provides an efficient way to construct multi-task generalist models without additional training, but its performance often degrades under severe task interference. Task interference in m...
Multi-task model merging aims to consolidate several task-specific experts into a unified model, yet static merging consistently suffers from parameter interference. While dynamic merging models aim to bridge this gap, many works rely on the costly storage and loading of redundant expert components at inference.
The paper introduces Net Utility, a data‑free metric for selecting which singular directions of low‑rank adapters (LoRAs) to keep when merging across tasks. By scoring each direction for task utility and interference, and then globally selecting the highest‑scoring directions under a total budget constraint, the method avoids the uniform‑budget assumption that hampers existing merging techniques. Experiments on vision and language tasks show that Net Utility‑based rank allocation yields about a 2% performance gain over other merging methods.