arXiv Machine Learning By Xinyu Tian, Xiaotong Shen

Statistical Gains from Looped Estimation under Parameter Budgets

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates whether a looped estimator—one that repeatedly applies a single fitted operator with shared parameters—can enhance statistical accuracy while staying within a fixed parameter budget. It establishes upper and lower bounds on squared Hellinger risk for looped sieve maximum likelihood and compares them to the untied counterpart, revealing a tradeoff between parameter sharing, iteration count, and accuracy. For models with known H"older smoothness, looped residual feedforward networks and a post‑layer‑normalized Transformer achieve minimax polynomial rates with a fixed number of bounded real parameters, and under certain conditions the looped estimator’s worst‑case risk vanishes as sample size grows, outperforming the untied approach.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Minimax-Optimal Generalization Bounds for Smooth Deep Neural Networks Trained by (Stochastic) Gradient Descent

arXiv:2606. 06772v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Characterizing the optimization dynamics and statistical performance of over-parameterized deep neural networks (DNNs) remains a central challenge in understanding the remarkable success of deep learning.

By Junyu Zhou, Puyu Wang, Dennis Wagner, Yunwen Lei, Marius Kloft, Yiming Ying