arXiv Machine Learning By Tavor Z. Baharav, Phillip B. Nicol, Rafael A. Irizarry, Rong Ma

Stacked SVD or SVD stacked? A Random Matrix Theory perspective on data integration

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper compares two popular data‑integration techniques—Stack‑SVD, which concatenates datasets before performing singular value decomposition, and SVD‑Stack, which first decomposes each dataset separately and then aggregates the leading singular vectors. By deriving exact asymptotic performance expressions and phase transitions in a proportional regime, the authors show that neither method uniformly dominates the other when unweighted, but optimally weighted Stack‑SVD outperforms optimally weighted SVD‑Stack when the low‑rank signal is fully shared. They also demonstrate that SVD‑Stack can excel with partially shared components and provide practical algorithms for estimating optimal weights, supported by simulations and genomic experiments.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

High-Dimensional Partial Least Squares: Spectral Analysis and Fundamental Limitations

The paper investigates Partial Least Squares (PLS) in high-dimensional settings, focusing on a model where two data matrices share a low-rank latent structure plus individual-specific components. By analyzing the singular vectors of the cross‑covariance matrix with random matrix theory, the authors derive asymptotic characterizations of how well the estimated latent directions align with the true ones. They show that the PLS variant based on Singular Value Decomposition (PLS‑SVD) outperforms separate principal component analysis in detecting the common latent subspace, while also identifying regimes where PLS‑SVD behaves counter‑intuitively or reaches fundamental limits.

By Victor L\'eger, Florent Chatelain
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Randomized SVD Approximations for Spectral Co-Clustering of Word-Document Matrices

The paper introduces two randomized approaches to accelerate spectral co‑clustering of word‑document matrices: one based on randomized SVD via random projection, and another combining partial SVD with element‑wise random sampling. Experiments on real and synthetic data show both methods cut runtime compared to full SVD, with the projection technique offering more consistent performance across varied sparsity levels, while the sampling method excels on denser matrices. The study highlights that the choice of approximation should align with the data’s structural properties.

By Fateme Mazdarani, Carlos Toxtli