arXiv AI
Stability and Generalization in Looped Transformers
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 8
Scaling to Tens of Thousands of Test-Time Iterations with Loop-Native Attention Residuals
The paper proposes InfiLoop, a loop-native residual connection designed for looped Transformers to prevent performance degradation as iterations increase. InfiLoop learns which past computations to retain and how much to accept from each new update, using content-based weighting and learned temporal decay to maintain a running summary of recurrent states. The approach yields strong results on reasoning tasks, achieving 97.9% exact accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme and 13.6% pass@2 on ARC-AGI-2, and continues to improve with over 20,000 test-time iterations.
arXiv AI
Oct 9
Scaling to Tens of Thousands of Test-Time Iterations with Loop-Native Attention Residuals
The paper introduces InfiLoop, a loop-native residual connection designed for looped Transformers to prevent performance degradation as iterations increase. InfiLoop learns which past computations to retain and how much to accept from each new update, combining content-based weighting with learned temporal decay to maintain a running summary of recurrent states. Across extensive reasoning tasks, a 7M-parameter InfiLoop model outperforms existing recursive architectures, achieving 97.9% exact accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme and 13.6% pass@2 on ARC-AGI-2, and continues to improve with test-time looping beyond 20,000 effective steps.
arXiv AI
Jun 17
Fixed-Point Reasoners: Stable and Adaptive Deep Looped Transformers
arXiv:2606. 18206v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped architectures provide an inductive bias toward learning step-by-step procedures for tasks that require compositional reasoning.
arXiv AI
Oct 2
Looping Beyond Twice: A Scalable Recipe for Looped Mixture-of-Experts
The paper introduces LOOM, a method for scaling looped mixture‑of‑experts (MoE) Transformers beyond the typical two‑loop limit. LOOM addresses two key obstacles: it stabilizes deep recurrence by bounding residual variance and re‑injecting the input embedding, and it prevents expert selection collapse by using per‑loop routers and a looping residual to maintain computational diversity. Experiments on 100 M–1.7 B parameter models show stable scaling to 9–12 loops, with significant perplexity reductions and zero‑shot accuracy gains under near‑iso‑FLOP conditions.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 1
Sparse Layers are Critical to Scaling Looped Language Models
arXiv:2605. 09165v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Looped language models repeat a set of transformer layers through depth, reducing memory costs and providing natural early-exit points at loop boundaries.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30
What Makes Recurrence Effective in Looped Language Models?
arXiv:2609.36636v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped language models (LoopLMs) increase computational depth through parameter sharing, offering a path to scale inference computation without adding...