arXiv Computer Vision By Raja Kumar, Rajat Koner, Ritwick Chaudhry, Zhuowei Li, Nishant Sankaran, Yifan Xing

SPLIT-RL: Staged Perception-Language Reasoning Training with Claim-Level Advantages

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

SPLIT-RL introduces a staged post‑training method that separates visual reasoning (VR) and language reasoning (LR) into distinct phases, allowing each phase to be optimized with a phase‑specific reward. The approach includes Claim‑Level Advantage (CLA‑GRPO), which breaks VR rollouts into atomic visual claims and assigns fine‑grained advantages based on visual‑type group formation. Experiments on Qwen3‑VL and InternVL models show that SPLIT‑RL improves average accuracy by 1.4–6.1 points over GRPO and enhances both VR and LR capabilities.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

Perception or Reasoning? Diagnosing and Tackling Reinforcement Learning Bottlenecks in VLMs

The paper introduces Perception and Reasoning Attribution (PARA), a method that quantifies how much of a vision‑language model’s errors can be fixed by better perception versus stronger reasoning. PARA reveals that reinforcement learning (RL) benefits more from improving reasoning than perception, and motivates a new group‑relative attention distillation objective called GRAD. GRAD directly guides weaker rollouts toward the visual attention patterns of the best rollouts, consistently boosting performance across multiple model scales and benchmarks.

By Zeyuan Yang, Zhuohao Chen, Jiaben Chen, Yao Zhang, Maohao Shen, Chuang Gan
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Stepwise Intrinsic Rewards for Reasoning in Large Language Models

The paper introduces Stepwise Marginal Information Gain (MIG), an intrinsic process reward that evaluates how each reasoning step of a large language model (LLM) or vision-language model (VLM) improves the likelihood of the reference answer. MIG rewards only new likelihood maxima, preventing duplicate credit, and is combined with outcome, format, and self‑distillation objectives to guide training. Experiments on eight benchmarks show that this method outperforms outcome‑only reinforcement learning and improves accuracy by up to 4.8 points over binary‑reward training, including a 12.6‑point gain on MathVerse and a 12.9‑point advantage on vision‑language transfer at 7B parameters.

By Xiangwei Wang, Wei Wang, Ken Chen, Nanduni Nimalsiri, Sachith Seneviratne, Saman Halgamuge