arXiv Machine Learning By Johnny Tian-Zheng Wei, Jerry Li, Ameya Godbole, Robin Jia

Spiking the training data to correct for test set contamination

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2605. 24818v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The literature on test set contamination largely focuses on detection, but the correction of contaminated test scores is underexplored.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

Contamination Inflates Scores but Rarely Reorders Large Language Model Leaderboards

The paper investigates how benchmark contamination—leakage of test items into training data—affects large language model (LLM) leaderboards. By comparing original test items with semantically equivalent paraphrases, the authors measure contamination as a violation of anchor-item invariance and find that it inflates absolute scores but rarely changes model rankings. Across 47 public models and 74 finetuned models on four benchmarks, the rank correlation between standard and paraphrase-controlled leaderboards is 0.997, with only a handful of cases showing differential contamination that could alter rankings.

By Xingyao Xiao (Stanford University), Yihong Cheng (City University of Macau)
arXiv AI
6d ago

Counterfactual Model Testing Under Distribution Shift

The paper addresses the problem of evaluating deployed machine learning models when their input data distribution shifts, which can arise from changes in the underlying population or from data integrity issues in the feature pipeline. It proposes an online model‑testing framework that reproduces the detected shift on a controlled baseline with known labels, distinguishing between the two mechanisms of shift to estimate current performance and potential gains from repairing data integrity problems. Experiments on real‑world datasets with simulated faults demonstrate that separating the two sources of shift generally improves performance estimates, and a churn‑prediction case study shows how these tests can guide monitoring and repair prioritization.

By Joran Leest, Ilias Gerostathopoulos, Claudia Raibulet, Patricia Lago